Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24578017›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2014

Newborn screening for SCID in New York State: experience from the first two years.

Beth H Vogel, Vincent Bonagura, Geoffrey A Weinberg, Mark Ballow, Jason Isabelle, Lisa DiAntonio, April Parker, Allison Young, Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles, Chin-To Fong and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A Spot of Good News: Israeli Experience With SCID Newborn Screening.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neonatal abstinence syndrome is a potential cause of low TREC copy number.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. First Year of TREC-Based National SCID Screening in Sweden.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Beth H VogelNewborn Screening Program, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, PO Box 509, Albany, NY, 12201-0509, USA, bmh06@health.state.ny.us.
Vincent Bonagura
Geoffrey A Weinberg
Mark Ballow
Jason Isabelle
Lisa DiAntonio
April Parker
Allison Young
Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles
Chin-To Fong
Jocelyn Celestin
Heather Lehman
Arye Rubinstein
Subhadra Siegel
Leonard Weiner
Carlos Saavedra-Matiz
Denise M Kay
Michele Caggana
Wadsworth Center · USNew York State Department of Health · USUniversity of Rochester · USWomen & Children's Hospital of Buffalo · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USCohen Children's Medical Center · USMontefiore Medical Center · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USWestchester Medical Center · US

Funding

TARGETING PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY AMONG MINORITIESR18AI048693 · NIAID · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI CUNNINGHAM-RUNDLES, CHARLOTTE · 2000 to 2016
$6.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R18 AI048693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the process and assess outcomes for the first 2 years of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID NBS) in New York State (NYS).

methodsThe NYS algorithm utilizes a first-tier molecular screen for TRECs (T-cell receptor excision circles), the absence of which is indicative of increased risk of immunodeficiency.

resultsDuring the first 2 years, 485,912 infants were screened for SCID. Repeat specimens were requested from 561 premature and 746 non-premature infants with low or borderline TRECs. A total of 531 infants were referred for diagnostic evaluation leading to identification of 10 infants with SCID and 87 with a clinically significant non-SCID abnormality based on flow cytometry or CBC results (positive predictive value 20.3 %). Nine infants were diagnosed with typical SCID and one with leaky SCID. SCID diagnoses included two patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency, three patients with typical and one with leaky IL2RG-related SCID, one patient with IL7Rα-related SCID, and three cases of typical SCID, etiology unknown. TRECs were undetectable in eight of the nine babies with typical SCID. Infants with other non-SCID conditions included 27 patients with a syndrome that included T-cell impairment, 18 of which had DiGeorge syndrome. Seventeen infants had T-cell impairment secondary to another clinically significant condition, and 13 were classified as 'other'. Among 30 infants classified as idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia, 11 have since resolved, and the remainder continues to be followed. One infant with undetectable TRECs had normal follow-up studies. Molecular studies revealed the presence of two changes in the infant's DNA.

conclusionsOverall, ten infants with SCID were identified during the first 2 years of screening in NYS, yielding an incidence of approximately 1 in 48,500 live births, which is consistent with the incidence observed by other states screening for SCID. The incidence of any clinically significant laboratory abnormality was approximately 1 in 5,000; both estimates are higher than estimates prior to the onset of newborn screening for SCID. Improvements to the NYS algorithm included the addition of a borderline category that reduced the proportion of infants referred for flow cytometric analysis, without decreasing sensitivity. We identified a large number of infants with abnormal TRECs and subsequent idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the prognosis and optimal treatment for this group of patients, some of whom may present with previously unrecognized, transient lymphopenia of infancy.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAlgorithmsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansImmunophenotypingInfant, NewbornMaleNew YorkReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySevere Combined Immunodeficiency

Identifiers

PMID24578017
PMCPMC4090801
OpenAlexW2027785491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.