ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2014
Newborn screening for SCID in New York State: experience from the first two years.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in the NHS newborn blood spot screening programme: a systematic review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022Pooled it
- TREC Based Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical immunology · 2015Pooled it
- Reference intervals for lymphocyte subsets in preterm and term neonates without immune defects.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Managing non-SCID T cell lymphopenia after TREC-based newborn screening.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- T-Cell Receptor Excision Circle/Kappa-Deleting Recombination Excision Circle-Based Newborn Screening Program for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in Kumamoto, Japan.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- Advancing Newborn Screening in Washington State: A Novel Multiplexed LC-MS/MS Proteomic Assay for Wilson Disease and Inborn Errors of Immunity.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
- Comprehensive newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and spinal muscular atrophy: the Chinese experience.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2024Article
- Newborn Screening for Severe T and B Cell Lymphopenia Using TREC/KREC Detection: A Large-Scale Pilot Study of 202,908 Newborns.Journal of clinical immunology · 2024Article
- Decreased TREC and KREC levels in newborns with trisomy 21.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Correcting inborn errors of immunity: From viral mediated gene addition to gene editing.Seminars in immunology · 2023Review
- Human thymus in health and disease: Recent advances in diagnosis and biology.Seminars in immunology · 2023Review
- A Spot of Good News: Israeli Experience With SCID Newborn Screening.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022Article
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Newborns with 22q11 Deletion Syndrome and Low TRECs.Journal of clinical immunology · 2022Article
- Implementation of TREC/KREC detection protocol for newborn SCID screening in Bulgaria: a pilot study.Central-European journal of immunology · 2022Article
- Neonatal abstinence syndrome is a potential cause of low TREC copy number.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021Article
- Second Tier Testing to Reduce the Number of Non-actionable Secondary Findings and False-Positive Referrals in Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.Journal of clinical immunology · 2021Article
- Modern diagnostic capabilities of neonatal screening for primary immunodeficiencies in newborns.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2021Article
- First Year of TREC-Based National SCID Screening in Sweden.International journal of neonatal screening · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo describe the process and assess outcomes for the first 2 years of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID NBS) in New York State (NYS).
methodsThe NYS algorithm utilizes a first-tier molecular screen for TRECs (T-cell receptor excision circles), the absence of which is indicative of increased risk of immunodeficiency.
resultsDuring the first 2 years, 485,912 infants were screened for SCID. Repeat specimens were requested from 561 premature and 746 non-premature infants with low or borderline TRECs. A total of 531 infants were referred for diagnostic evaluation leading to identification of 10 infants with SCID and 87 with a clinically significant non-SCID abnormality based on flow cytometry or CBC results (positive predictive value 20.3 %). Nine infants were diagnosed with typical SCID and one with leaky SCID. SCID diagnoses included two patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency, three patients with typical and one with leaky IL2RG-related SCID, one patient with IL7Rα-related SCID, and three cases of typical SCID, etiology unknown. TRECs were undetectable in eight of the nine babies with typical SCID. Infants with other non-SCID conditions included 27 patients with a syndrome that included T-cell impairment, 18 of which had DiGeorge syndrome. Seventeen infants had T-cell impairment secondary to another clinically significant condition, and 13 were classified as 'other'. Among 30 infants classified as idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia, 11 have since resolved, and the remainder continues to be followed. One infant with undetectable TRECs had normal follow-up studies. Molecular studies revealed the presence of two changes in the infant's DNA.
conclusionsOverall, ten infants with SCID were identified during the first 2 years of screening in NYS, yielding an incidence of approximately 1 in 48,500 live births, which is consistent with the incidence observed by other states screening for SCID. The incidence of any clinically significant laboratory abnormality was approximately 1 in 5,000; both estimates are higher than estimates prior to the onset of newborn screening for SCID. Improvements to the NYS algorithm included the addition of a borderline category that reduced the proportion of infants referred for flow cytometric analysis, without decreasing sensitivity. We identified a large number of infants with abnormal TRECs and subsequent idiopathic T-cell lymphopenia. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the prognosis and optimal treatment for this group of patients, some of whom may present with previously unrecognized, transient lymphopenia of infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.