Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24577971›Full record

Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2014

Randomized controlled trial of Nuevo Amanecer: a peer-delivered stress management intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer.

Anna M Nápoles, Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson, Carmen Ortiz, Steven Gregorich, Howard E Lee, Ysabel Duron, Kristi Graves, Judith A Luce, Peggy McGuire, Marynieves Díaz-Méndez and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Engaging Latina cancer survivors, their caregivers, and community partners in a randomized controlled trial: Nueva Vida intervention.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluating the Implementation of a Translational Peer-Delivered Stress Management Program for Spanish-Speaking Latina Breast Cancer Survivors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  18. Understanding the Stress Management Needs and Preferences of Latinas Undergoing Chemotherapy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Worry about recurrence in a multi-ethnic population of breast cancer survivors and their partners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anna M NápolesaCenter for Aging in Diverse Communities, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson
Carmen Ortiz
Steven Gregorich
Howard E Lee
Ysabel Duron
Kristi Graves
Judith A Luce
Peggy McGuire
Marynieves Díaz-Méndez
Anita L Stewart
University of California, San Francisco · USCírculo de Vida · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USRayos Contra Cancer · USSan Mateo Medical Center · USWomen's Resource Center · US

Funding

RESOURCE CENTER FOR AGING RESEARCH IN DIVERSE POPULATIONP30AG015272 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEAH S KARLINER · 1997 to 2026
$19.5M
Training ProgramU54CA153511 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI RAMIREZ, AMELIE G · 2010 to 2015
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA153511NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153511NIA NIH HHS 1 P30 AG15272NIA NIH HHS P30 AG015272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatinas with breast cancer suffer symptom and psychosocial health disparities. Effective interventions have not been developed for or tested in this population. PURPOSE: We describe community-based participatory research methods used to develop and implement the Nuevo Amanecer program, a culturally tailored, peer-delivered cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention for low-income Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer, and unique considerations in implementing a randomized controlled trial to test the program in community settings.

methodsWe applied an implementation science framework to delineate the methodological phases used to develop and implement the Nuevo Amanecer program and trial, emphasizing community engagement processes.

resultsIn phase 1, we established project infrastructure: academic and community co-principal investigators, community partners, community advisory board, steering committee, and funding. In phase 2, we identified three program inputs: formative research, a community best-practices model, and an evidence-based intervention tested in non-Latinas. In phase 3, we created the new program by integrating and adapting intervention components from the three sources, making adaptations to accommodate low literacy, Spanish language, cultural factors, community context, and population needs. In phase 4, we built community capacity for the program and trial by training field staff (recruiters and interventionists embedded in community sites), compensating field staff, and creating a system for identifying potential participants. In phase 5, we implemented and monitored the program and trial. Engaging community partners in all phases has resulted in a new, culturally tailored program that is suitable for newly diagnosed Latinas with breast cancer and a trial that is acceptable and supported by community and clinical partners. Lessons learned Engagement of community-based organizations and cancer survivors as research partners and hiring recruiters and interventionists from the community were critical to successful implementation in community settings. Having culturally and linguistically competent research staff with excellent interpersonal skills facilitated implementation. Facilitating and maintaining excellent communication among community partners was imperative to troubleshoot implementation issues. Randomization was challenging due to community concerns about assigning women to a control group. Patient privacy regulations and the need for extensive outreach to establish relationships between community partners and clinical sites hampered initial recruitment. LIMITATIONS: These were resource-intensive processes to develop and implement the program that need to be compared to less-intensive alternatives.

conclusionEngaging community members in design and implementation of community-based programs and trials enhances cultural appropriateness and congruence with the community context. If the randomized trial demonstrates that the intervention is effective, it will fill a gap in evidence-based programs to address ethnic disparities in quality of life among Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionPeer GroupAdultBreast NeoplasmsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID24577971
PMCPMC3972263
OpenAlexW1964112584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.