Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24577583›Full record

ReviewToxins2014

Overview of scorpion species from China and their toxins.

Zhijian Cao, Zhiyong Di, Yingliang Wu, Wenxin Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex-Biased Gene Expression ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Designer and natural peptide toxin blockers of the KcsA potassium channel identified by phage display.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhijian CaoState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China. zjcao@whu.edu.cn.
Zhiyong DiState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China. scorpionking@whu.edu.cn.
Yingliang WuState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China. ylwu@whu.edu.cn.
Wenxin LiState Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China. liwxlab@whu.edu.cn.
Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scorpions are one of the most ancient groups of terrestrial animals. They have maintained a steady morphology over more than 400 million years of evolution. Their venom arsenals for capturing prey and defending against predators may play a critical role in their ancient and conservative appearance. In the current review, we present the scorpion fauna of China: 53 species covering five families and 12 genera. We also systematically list toxins or genes from Chinese scorpion species, involving eight species covering four families. Furthermore, we review the diverse functions of typical toxins from Chinese scorpion species, involving Na+ channel modulators, K+ channel blockers, antimicrobial peptides and protease inhibitors. Using scorpion species and their toxins from China as an example, we build the bridge between scorpion species and their toxins, which helps us to understand the molecular and functional diversity of scorpion venom arsenal, the dynamic and functional evolution of scorpion toxins, and the potential relationships of scorpion species and their toxins.

Indexed as

AnimalsChinaScorpionsToxins, BiologicalToxins, Biological

Identifiers

PMID24577583
PMCPMC3968362
OpenAlexW1988953200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.