Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24577410›Full record

ArticleJournal of hypertension2014

Cardiovascular risk assessment in low-resource settings: a consensus document of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk in Low Resource Settings.

Pietro A Modesti, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Charles Agyemang, Sanjay Basu, Athanase Benetos, Francesco P Cappuccio, Antonio Ceriello, Stefano Del Prato, Robert Kalyesubula, Eoin O'Brien and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hypertension, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 11 countries.

Pietro A ModestiaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence bCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy cDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands dUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, USA eINSERM UMR S1116, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, Nancy, France fUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, and University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK gInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Barcelona, Spain hSection of Metabolic Diseases and Diabetes, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy iMakerere University, Kampala, Uganda jThe Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland kBenedict Medical Center, Kampala, Uganda lClinica Medica II, University of Pavia, Pavia mInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa nDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia oIRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Bergamo, Italy pDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK qFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium rDepartment of Geriatrics, CHU Nancy, Nancy, France sBeijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China tDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca uDepartment of Cardiology, S. Luca Hospital, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Piergiuseppe Agostoni
Charles Agyemang
Sanjay Basu
Athanase Benetos
Francesco P Cappuccio
Antonio Ceriello
Stefano Del Prato
Robert Kalyesubula
Eoin O'Brien
Michael O Kilama
Stefano Perlini
Eugenio Picano
Gianpaolo Reboldi
Giuseppe Remuzzi
David Stuckler
Marc Twagirumukiza
Luc M Van Bortel
Ghassan Watfa
Dong Zhao
Gianfranco Parati
ESH Working Group on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk in Low Resource Settings
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Warwick · GBBeijing Anzhen Hospital · CNCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESInserm · FRIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITMakerere University · UGMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

CORE--PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTP30AG017253 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BHATTACHARYA, JAY · 1999 to 2019
$5.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 confirms ischemic heart disease and stroke as the leading cause of death and that hypertension is the main associated risk factor worldwide. How best to respond to the rising prevalence of hypertension in resource-deprived settings is a topic of ongoing public-health debate and discussion. In low-income and middle-income countries, socioeconomic inequality and cultural factors play a role both in the development of risk factors and in the access to care. In Europe, cultural barriers and poor communication between health systems and migrants may limit migrants from receiving appropriate prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. To use more efficiently resources available and to make treatment cost-effective at the patient level, cardiovascular risk approach is now recommended. In 2011, The European Society of Hypertension established a Working Group on 'Hypertension and Cardiovascular risk in low resource settings', which brought together cardiologists, diabetologists, nephrologists, clinical trialists, epidemiologists, economists, and other stakeholders to review current strategies for cardiovascular risk assessment in population studies in low-income and middle-income countries, their limitations, possible improvements, and future interests in screening programs. This report summarizes current evidence and presents highlights of unmet needs.

Indexed as

Resource AllocationSocieties, MedicalCardiovascular DiseasesDeveloping CountriesEuropeHumansHypertensionRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID24577410
PMCPMC3979828
OpenAlexW2106524564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.