Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24577182›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2014

[Acute pancreatitis].

M Hecker, K Mayer, I Askevold, P Collet, M A Weigand, G A Krombach, W Padberg, A Hecker

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Evidence-based interdisciplinary treatment of abdominal sepsis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Review
  5. Acute pancreatitis with gradient echo T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2016
    Article
  6. [Diagnosis and therapy of an acute abdomen].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M HeckerMedizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Standort Gießen, Klinikstr. 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland, Matthias.Hecker@innere.med.uni-giessen.de.
K Mayer
I Askevold
P Collet
M A Weigand
G A Krombach
W Padberg
A Hecker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is a potentially fatal disease with individually differing expression of systemic involvement. For this reason early diagnosis with subsequent risk stratification is essential in the clinical management of this frequent gastroenterological disorder. Severe forms of acute pancreatitis occur in approximately 20 % of cases often requiring intensive care monitoring and interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches. In the acute phase adequate fluid replacement and sufficient analgesic therapy is of major therapeutic importance. Concerning the administration of antibiotics and the nutritional support of patients with acute pancreatitis a change in paradigms could be observed in recent years. Furthermore, endoscopic, radiological or surgical interventions can be necessary depending on the severity of the disease and potential complications.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnalgesicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomyEndoscopyEnteral NutritionFluid TherapyHumansNutritional SupportPainPain ManagementPancreatitisPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingAnalgesicsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24577182
PMCPMC7095909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.