Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24576858›Full record

Trial reportMedicine and science in sports and exercise2014

Effects of altered airway function on exercise ventilation in asthmatic adults.

Matthew J Rossman, Susan Nader, Dustin Berry, Francesca Orsini, Andrew Klansky, Hans Christian Haverkamp

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ventilatory efficiency in athletes, asthma and obesity.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Physical Activity: A Missing Link in Asthma Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew J RossmanDepartment of Environmental and Health Sciences, Johnson State College, Johnson, VT.
Susan Nader
Dustin Berry
Francesca Orsini
Andrew Klansky
Hans Christian Haverkamp

Funding

Vermont INBRE Administrative Supplement 2024 AWD 118P20GM103449 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI CHRISTOPHER S FRANCKLYN · 2012 to 2026
$58.4M
VOLATILE SIGNALING IN PHARBITIS NILP20RR016462 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI KIRSHENBAUM, ARI PHILLIP · 2001 to 2011
$31.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016462NIGMS NIH HHS 8P20GM103449NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVariable airway function is a central feature of the asthmatic condition. Thus, habitually active asthmatics are certain to exercise under conditions of variable airway (dys)function. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of variable preexercise airway function on ventilation during whole-body exercise in asthmatic adults.

methodsEight mild asthmatic (age = 26 yr; V˙O2peak = 49 mL·kg·min) and nine nonasthmatic (age = 30 yr; V˙O2peak = 46 mL·kg·min) adults performed constant workrate cycling exercise to exhaustion after four separate interventions: 1) a control trial (CON); 2) inhalation of fast-acting β2-agonist (BD); 3) eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea challenge (BC); and 4) sham to the hyperpnea (SHAM). Pulmonary function was assessed at baseline and after each intervention. Exercise ventilation and operating lung volumes were compared among the four exercise trials in both control and asthmatic subjects.

resultsBaseline pulmonary function was significantly lower in asthmatic subjects compared with control subjects. In asthmatic subjects, postintervention (i.e., preexercise) forced expiratory volume 1.0 s was significantly different among the four exercise trials (CON = 3.5 ± 0.4, BD = 4.1 ± 0.4, SHAM = 3.6 ± 0.3, BC = 2.8 ± 0.3 L, P < 0.05), whereas it was not different in control subjects. There were no differences in exercise ventilation or operating lung volumes during exercise among the four trials either within asthmatic subjects or between control and asthmatic subjects.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the state of airway function-whether bronchodilated or bronchoconstricted-before exercise in the mild asthmatic does not affect the exercise ventilatory response. Thus, ventilatory system function in the asthmatic appears to be responsive to the acute requirement for increased airflow during whole-body exercise.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAsthmaBronchoconstrictionBronchodilator AgentsExerciseExercise TestFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMaximal Midexpiratory Flow RatePeak Expiratory Flow RatePulmonary VentilationVital CapacityAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID24576858
PMCPMC4028423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.