Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24576618›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2014

RNAi screening in Drosophila cells and in vivo.

Stephanie E Mohr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetics in Light of Transcriptional Adaptation.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Generating and working with Drosophila cell cultures: Current challenges and opportunities.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Optimized strategy for in vivo Cas9-activation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Regionalization of surface lipids in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephanie E MohrDrosophila RNAi Screening Center, Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: stephanie_mohr@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI A. Heather Eliassen · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
New collections of dsRNAs and overexpression miRNA constructs to supplement RNAiR01GM067761 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2003 to 2019
$15.5M
Drosophila Transgenic RNAi Resource ProjectR01GM084947 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2008 to 2019
$9.8M
Development of Validated Drosophila in vivo RNAi Models of Human DiseasesR24RR032668 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2011 to 2011
$440k
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30 CA06516NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR032668NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067761NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, I discuss how RNAi screening can be used effectively to uncover gene function. Specifically, I discuss the types of high-throughput assays that can be done in Drosophila cells and in vivo, RNAi reagent design and available reagent collections, automated screen pipelines, analysis of screen results, and approaches to RNAi results verification.

Indexed as

RNA InterferenceAnimalsDevelopmental BiologyDrosophilaGenomicsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysCell-based assaysDrosophilaFunctional genomicsHigh-throughput screeningIn vivo assaysRNAi

Identifiers

PMID24576618
PMCPMC4206080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.