Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24576504›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

Assessment of the sensitivity of the gamma-interferon test and the single intradermal comparative cervical test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis under field conditions.

A Praud, M L Boschiroli, L Meyer, B Garin-Bastuji, B Dufour

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Modeling the Accuracy of TwoFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A PraudUniversité Paris-Est,Alfort National Veterinary School, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases Unit, ENVA USC ANSES, Maisons-Alfort, F-94704,France.
M L BoschiroliANSES, Animal Health Laboratory, National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, Maisons-Alfort, F-94706,France.
L MeyerINSERM, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), U1018, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; AP-HP, Hopital Bicêtre, Epidemiology and Public Health Service,Université Paris-Sud,Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94276,France.
B Garin-BastujiANSES, Animal Health Laboratory, National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, Maisons-Alfort, F-94706,France.
B DufourUniversité Paris-Est,Alfort National Veterinary School, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases Unit, ENVA USC ANSES, Maisons-Alfort, F-94704,France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In some French départements, the eradication of bovine tuberculosis is incomplete and usual skin tests [single intradermal tuberculin test (SIT) and single intradermal comparative cervical test (SICCT)] have poor specificity due to cross-reactions with non-pathogenic mycobacteria, causing economic losses. In Côte d'Or (Burgundy, France), an experimental serial testing scheme based on the combination of SICCT and gamma-interferon (IFN-γ) tests has been initiated in order to shorten the interval between suspicion and its invalidation in herds with false-positive results to skin tests. Our aim was to assess the scheme's sensitivity and to compare it to the sensitivity of the screening scheme recommended by the European Commission. Our study included 1768 animals from Côte d'Or. The sensitivities of both schemes were estimated using a Bayesian approach. The individual sensitivity of the IFN-γ test [88·1%, 95% credibility interval (CrI) 72·8-97·5] was not significantly different from individual SICCT sensitivity (80·3%, 95% CrI 61·6-98·0) and individual SIT sensitivity (84·2%, 95% CrI 59·0-98·2). The individual specificity of the IFN-γ test was 62·3% (95% CrI 60·2-64·5). No significant difference could be demonstrated between the sensitivities of the serial testing scheme used in Côte d'Or (73·1%, 95% CrI 41·1-100) and the European Union serial testing scheme (70·1%, 95% CrI 31·5-100·0).

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFranceInterferon-gamma Release TestsMass ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculin TestTuberculosis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID24576504
PMCPMC9206784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.