Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24576321›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

What is the ideal dose and power output of low-level laser therapy (810 nm) on muscle performance and post-exercise recovery? Study protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Adriano Rodrigues de Oliveira, Adriane Aver Vanin, Thiago De Marchi, Fernanda Colella Antonialli, Vanessa dos Santos Grandinetti, Paulo Roberto Vicente de Paiva, Gianna Móes Albuquerque Pontes, Larissa Aline Santos, Ivo de Oliveira Aleixo Junior, Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01844271 (Low Level Laser Therapy in Muscle Fatigue and Muscle Recovery After Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01844271 nacompletednot on this map

Low Level Laser Therapy in Muscle Fatigue and Muscle Recovery After Exercise: What is the Ideal Dose?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nove de JulhoRan2013 to 2013Enrolled28ConditionsMuscle, Fatigue, Heart, Skeletal Muscle RecoveryArmsLow Level Laser (LLL)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriano Rodrigues de Oliveira
Adriane Aver Vanin
Thiago De Marchi
Fernanda Colella Antonialli
Vanessa dos Santos Grandinetti
Paulo Roberto Vicente de Paiva
Gianna Móes Albuquerque Pontes
Larissa Aline Santos
Ivo de Oliveira Aleixo Junior
Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho
Jan Magnus Bjordal
Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-JuniorPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Rua Vergueiro 235, São Paulo, SP 01504-001, Brazil. ernesto.leal.junior@gmail.com.
Universidade Nove de Julho · BRUniversidade de Caxias do Sul · BRUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies involving phototherapy applied prior to exercise have demonstrated positive results regarding the attenuation of muscle fatigue and the expression of biochemical markers associated with recovery. However, a number of factors remain unknown, such as the ideal dose and application parameters, mechanisms of action and long-term effects on muscle recovery. The aims of the proposed project are to evaluate the long-term effects of low-level laser therapy on post-exercise musculoskeletal recovery and identify the best dose andapplication power/irradiation time. DESIGN AND

methodsA double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with be conducted. After fulfilling the eligibility criteria, 28 high-performance athletes will be allocated to four groups of seven volunteers each. In phase 1, the laser power will be 200 mW and different doses will be tested: Group A (2 J), Group B (6 J), Group C (10 J) and Group D (0 J). In phase 2, the best dose obtained in phase 1 will be used with the same distribution of the volunteers, but with different powers: Group A (100 mW), Group B (200 mW), Group C (400 mW) and Group D (0 mW). The isokinetic test will be performed based on maximum voluntary contraction prior to the application of the laser and after the eccentric contraction protocol, which will also be performed using the isokinetic dynamometer. The following variables related to physical performance will be analyzed: peak torque/maximum voluntary contraction, delayed onset muscle soreness (algometer), biochemical markers of muscle damage, inflammation and oxidative stress. DISCUSSION: Our intention, is to determine optimal laser therapy application parameters capable of slowing down the physiological muscle fatigue process, reducing injuries or micro-injuries in skeletal muscle stemming from physical exertion and accelerating post-exercise muscle recovery. We believe that, unlike drug therapy, LLLT has a biphasic dose-response pattern.

trial registrationThe protocol for this study is registered with the Protocol Registry System, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01844271.

Indexed as

ExerciseRadiation DosageResearch DesignBiomarkersBiomechanical PhenomenaBrazilClinical ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodHumansInflammation MediatorsLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalOxidative StressBiomarkersInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID24576321
PMCPMC3944795
OpenAlexW2111389999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.