Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24576146›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2014

The taccalonolides and paclitaxel cause distinct effects on microtubule dynamics and aster formation.

April L Risinger, Stephen M Riffle, Manu Lopus, Mary A Jordan, Leslie Wilson, Susan L Mooberry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting Breast Cancer: An Overlook on Current Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Taccalonolide Microtubule Stabilizers.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Increased expression of MyD88 and association with paclitaxel resistance in breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

April L RisingerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. risingera@uthscsa.edu.
Stephen M Riffle
Manu Lopus
Mary A Jordan
Leslie Wilson
Susan L Mooberry
University of California, Santa Barbara · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USCenter for Excellence in Basic Sciences · IN

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Taccalonolides: Mechanisms of Action and Cellular ResistanceR01CA121138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI MOOBERRY, SUSAN L · 2006 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA121138NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrotubule stabilizers suppress microtubule dynamics and, at the lowest antiproliferative concentrations, disrupt the function of mitotic spindles, leading to mitotic arrest and apoptosis. At slightly higher concentrations, these agents cause the formation of multiple mitotic asters with distinct morphologies elicited by different microtubule stabilizers.

resultsWe tested the hypothesis that two classes of microtubule stabilizing drugs, the taxanes and the taccalonolides, cause the formation of distinct aster structures due, in part, to differential effects on microtubule dynamics. Paclitaxel and the taccalonolides suppressed the dynamics of microtubules formed from purified tubulin as well as in live cells. Both agents suppressed microtubule dynamic instability, with the taccalonolides having a more pronounced inhibition of microtubule catastrophe, suggesting that they stabilize the plus ends of microtubules more effectively than paclitaxel. Live cell microscopy was also used to evaluate the formation and resolution of asters after drug treatment. While each drug had similar effects on initial formation, substantial differences were observed in aster resolution. Paclitaxel-induced asters often coalesced over time resulting in fewer, larger asters whereas numerous compact asters persisted once they were formed in the presence of the taccalonolides.

conclusionsWe conclude that the increased resistance of microtubule plus ends to catastrophe may play a role in the observed inability of taccalonolide-induced asters to coalesce during mitosis, giving rise to the distinct morphologies observed after exposure to these agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCattleHeLa CellsHumansMCF-7 CellsMicrotubulesPaclitaxelSteroidsTubulin ModulatorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelSteroidstaccalonolide AJTubulin Modulators

Identifiers

PMID24576146
PMCPMC4015978
OpenAlexW2115733082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.