Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24576047›Full record

ArticleRadiology2014

Potential predictors of side-branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention: a coronary CT angiography study.

Jin Joo Park, Eun Ju Chun, Young-Seok Cho, Il-Young Oh, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Jung-Won Suh, Sang Il Choi, Tae-Jin Youn, Bon-Kwon Koo, In-Ho Chae and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The 17th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club - techniques to preserve access to the side branch during stepwise provisional stenting.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.Korean circulation journal · 2018
    Review
  11. Recent Advances in Nuclear Cardiology.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin Joo ParkFrom the Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumiro-173-gil, Bundang, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 463-707, South Korea (J.J.P., E.J.C., Y.S.C., I.Y.O., C.H.Y., J.W.S., S.I.C., T.J.Y., I.H.C., D.J.C.); and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (B.K.K.).
Eun Ju Chun
Young-Seok Cho
Il-Young Oh
Chang-Hwan Yoon
Jung-Won Suh
Sang Il Choi
Tae-Jin Youn
Bon-Kwon Koo
In-Ho Chae
Dong-Ju Choi
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify potential predictors of side-branch occlusion after main-vessel (artery) stent implantation in bifurcation lesions by using coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. Sixty-five patients with de novo bifurcation lesions underwent coronary CT angiography before percutaneous coronary intervention. By defining side-branch occlusion as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 2 or lower, coronary CT angiography plaque characteristics associated with side-branch occlusion (ie, plaque morphology and composition) were analyzed. A multiple logistic regression analysis was undertaken to determine independent potential predictors of side-branch occlusion.

resultsOf 65 patients enrolled, 12 patients (18%) had side-branch occlusion after main-vessel stent implantation. Patients with side-branch occlusion had larger mean plaque thickness in the side-branch side of the proximal main vessel (2.29 mm ± 1.87 [standard deviation] vs 1.29 mm ± 1.43, P = .043), larger plaque thickness in the noncarinal side of the side branch (1.43 mm ± 1.18 vs 0.51 mm ± 0.65, P < .001), smaller side-branch lumen diameter (1.24 mm ± 0.74 vs 1.87 mm ± 0.71, P = .007), and higher diameter stenosis (50.9% ± 24.0 vs 25.5% ± 25.3, P = .002) compared with those without side-branch occlusion. The cutoff value of proximal main vessel plaque thickness was 2.7 mm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48, 0.86) and of side-branch-diameter stenosis was 40% (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.92). Lesions with plaque thickness in proximal main vessel greater than 2.7 mm and side-branch-diameter stenosis greater than 40% were associated with a 5.6-fold and 6.2-fold, respectively, increased risk of side-branch occlusion.

conclusionPotential coronary CT angiography predictors of side-branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions are plaque thickness in the side-branch side of the proximal main vessel, plaque thickness in the noncarinal side of the side branch, side-branch lumen diameter, and side-branch-diameter stenosis. These potential predictors might guide operators planning the optimal strategy for treating bifurcation lesions.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisFemaleHumansIopamidolMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaiomeprolIopamidol

Identifiers

PMID24576047
OpenAlexW2136369610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.