Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24575833›Full record

ArticleExpert review of molecular diagnostics2014

A microRNA meta-signature for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Adam E Frampton, Elisa Giovannetti, Nigel B Jamieson, Jonathan Krell, Tamara Mh Gall, Justin Stebbing, Long R Jiao, Leandro Castellano

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Current State of "Omics" Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam E FramptonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, HPB Surgical Unit, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Elisa Giovannetti
Nigel B Jamieson
Jonathan Krell
Tamara Mh Gall
Justin Stebbing
Long R Jiao
Leandro Castellano
Hammersmith Hospital · GBAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14549Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its aggressive and late presentation, there is an urgent need for novel and reliable biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognostication of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MiRNAs have been extensively profiled in PDAC tissues, biopsies, blood samples and other biofluids and their expression levels compared to normal and chronic pancreatitis (CP) specimens in order to identify the most relevant candidates. Consolidation of these activities has not been attempted until now. The evaluated meta-review by Ma et al. helps to define the use of miRNAs as biomarkers for detecting this tumor-type and predicting survival outcomes in PDAC. Based on frequency and consistency between microarray studies, they identified a miRNA meta-signature for recognising PDAC: upregulation of miR-21, 23a, 31, 100, 143, 155, and 221; with downregulation of miR-148a, 217 and 375. Furthermore, they validated high miR-21, high miR-31 and low miR-375 tumoural expression as independently prognostic for poor overall-survival (OS; n = 70).

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalHumansMicroRNAsPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID24575833
OpenAlexW1975398023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.