ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014
Drying without senescence in resurrection plants.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- The architecture of resilience: a genome assembly of Myrothamnus flabellifolia sheds light on desiccation tolerance and sex determination.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Genotype-specific transcriptomic response to drought stress in potato cultivars modulated by microbial biostimulants.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Defying Death: A Multi-Omics Approach to Understanding Desiccation Tolerance and Senescence inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The promise of resurrection plants in enhancing crop tolerance to water scarcity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Metabolite Profiling of the Resurrection GrassPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of soybean intercropping density on photosynthetic characteristics and disease resistance in tobacco.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Surviving water scarcity: seasonal contrasts in drought and desiccation tolerance of co-occurringFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Gene family rearrangements and transcriptional priming drive the evolution of vegetative desiccation tolerance in Selaginella.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Desiccation tolerance in the resurrection plantFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Tripogon loliiformis tolerates rapid desiccation after metabolic and transcriptional priming during initial drying.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CBL-Interacting Protein Kinases 18 (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genome-wide identification of NF-Y gene family in maize (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Recovery from Salinity and Drought Stress in the PerennialPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Systems biology of resurrection plants.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Stachyose triggers apoptotic like cell death in drought sensitive but not resilient plants.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Article
- Desiccation Mitigates Heat Stress in the Resurrection Fern,Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Editorial: Unifying Insights into the Desiccation Tolerance Mechanisms of Resurrection Plants and Seeds.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research into extreme drought tolerance in resurrection plants using species such as Craterostigma plantagineum, C. wilmsii, Xerophyta humilis, Tortula ruralis, and Sporobolus stapfianus has provided some insight into the desiccation tolerance mechanisms utilized by these plants to allow them to persist under extremely adverse environmental conditions. Some of the mechanisms used to ensure cellular preservation during severe dehydration appear to be peculiar to resurrection plants. Apart from the ability to preserve vital cellular components during drying and rehydration, such mechanisms include the ability to down-regulate growth-related metabolism rapidly in response to changes in water availability, and the ability to inhibit dehydration-induced senescence programs enabling reconstitution of photosynthetic capacity quickly following a rainfall event. Extensive research on the molecular mechanism of leaf senescence in non-resurrection plants has revealed a multi-layered regulatory network operates to control programed cell death pathways. However, very little is known about the molecular mechanisms that resurrection plants employ to avoid undergoing drought-related senescence during the desiccation process. To survive desiccation, dehydration in the perennial resurrection grass S. stapfianus must proceed slowly over a period of 7 days or more. Leaves detached from the plant before 60% relative water content (RWC) is attained are desiccation-sensitive indicating that desiccation tolerance is conferred in vegetative tissue of S. stapfianus when the leaf RWC has declined to 60%. Whilst some older leaves remaining attached to the plant during dehydration will senesce, suggesting dehydration-induced senescence may be influenced by leaf age or the rate of dehydration in individual leaves, the majority of leaves do not senesce. Rather these leaves dehydrate to air-dryness and revive fully following rehydration. Hence it seems likely that there are genes expressed in younger leaf tissues of resurrection plants that enable suppression of drought-related senescence pathways. As very few studies have directly addressed this phenomenon, this review aims to discuss current literature surrounding the activation and suppression of senescence pathways and how these pathways may differ in resurrection plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.