ArticleFrontiers in neuroengineering2014
When "I" becomes "We": ethical implications of emerging brain-to-brain interfacing technologies.
Article in Frontiers in neuroengineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decentralising the Self - Ethical Considerations in Utilizing Decentralised Web Technology for Direct Brain Interfaces.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Merging Minds: The Conceptual and Ethical Impacts of Emerging Technologies for Collective Minds.Neuroethics · 2023Article
- Brain augmentation and neuroscience technologies: current applications, challenges, ethics and future prospects.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Projections and the Potential Societal Impact of the Future of Neurotechnologies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- TechnoBrainBodies-in-Cultures: An Intersectional Case.Frontiers in sociology · 2021Article
- Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human "Intelligent BCI" Trial.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
- Multi-Person Brain-To-Brain Interfaces: Ethical Issues.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Article
- Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- "Knock once for yes, twice for no".Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2015Article
- Systems neuroscience in focus: from the human brain to the global brain?Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- What will this do to me and my brain? Ethical issues in brain-to-brain interfacing.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.