Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574989›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Assessing learning as a possible sign of consciousness in post-coma persons with minimal responsiveness.

Giulio E Lancioni, Andrea Bosco, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Francesca Buonocunto, Jorge Navarro, Crocifissa Lanzilotti, Fiora D'Amico and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giulio E LancioniDepartment of Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Bari, Italy.
Andrea BoscoDepartment of Educational Science, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Bari, Italy.
Marta Olivetti BelardinelliDepartment of Psychology, University "La Sapienza" Rome, Italy.
Nirbhay N SinghMedical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University Augusta, GA, USA.
Mark F O'ReillyUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, USA.
Jeff SigafoosVictoria University of Wellington Wellington, New Zealand.
Francesca BuonocuntoS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Jorge NavarroS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Crocifissa LanzilottiS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Fiora D'AmicoS. Raffaele Rehabilitation and Care Centers Ceglie and Alberobello, Italy.
Marina De TommasoDepartment of Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A learning test procedure based on operant principles may be useful in the diagnosis (and eventually rehabilitation) of post-coma persons with minimal responsiveness. This study was aimed at extending the evaluation of such a procedure with seven participants who presented with very limited behavior and apparently severe disorders of consciousness. The procedure was evaluated through an ABACB design, in which A represented baseline phases without stimulation, B intervention phases with brief stimulation periods contingent on specific responses of the participants, and C a control phase in which stimulation was available all the time. Increased responding during the B phases, as opposed to the A and C phases, was taken to indicate learning and possibly a non-reflective expression of phenomenal consciousness. All participants were also evaluated with the coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R) prior to the start of the learning test procedure and at the end of it. The results of the learning test showed that all participants had significantly higher responding levels during the B phases. The CRS-R scores suggested minimally conscious state for four of them prior to the learning test and for five of them after the completion of the learning test. The implications of the findings are discussed in terms of potential and time cost of the learning test.

Indexed as

learningmicroswitchesminimally conscious statevegetative state

Identifiers

PMID24574989
PMCPMC3918875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.