Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574768›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Circulating and stool nucleic acid analysis for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Giulia De Maio, Claudia Rengucci, Wainer Zoli, Daniele Calistri

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Is methylation analysis ofIntestinal research · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Early detection of colorectal cancer: from conventional methods to novel biomarkers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia De MaioGiulia De Maio, Claudia Rengucci, Wainer Zoli, Daniele Calistri, Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Via Piero Maroncelli, 40-47014 Meldola, Italy.
Claudia RengucciGiulia De Maio, Claudia Rengucci, Wainer Zoli, Daniele Calistri, Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Via Piero Maroncelli, 40-47014 Meldola, Italy.
Wainer ZoliGiulia De Maio, Claudia Rengucci, Wainer Zoli, Daniele Calistri, Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Via Piero Maroncelli, 40-47014 Meldola, Italy.
Daniele CalistriGiulia De Maio, Claudia Rengucci, Wainer Zoli, Daniele Calistri, Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Via Piero Maroncelli, 40-47014 Meldola, Italy.
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the need to identify molecular markers characterized by high sensitivity and specificity in detecting and monitoring early and colorectal cancer lesions has increased. Up to now, none of the markers or panels of markers analyzed have met the rigorous standards required of a screening program. The important discovery of circulating nucleic acids in biological fluids has aroused intense scientific interest because of their usefulness in malignant and non malignant diseases. Over time, their yield and stability have been identified and compared with other "standard" biomarkers. The analysis of circulating DNA from blood and stool is a relatively simple and non-invasive procedure, representing a very attractive marker to detect genetic and epigenetic mutations and to monitor disease progression. A correlation between blood and stool biomarkers could also help to enhance currently available diagnostic approaches. However, various processing and analytic problems need to be resolved before such an approach can be applied in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmEarly Detection of CancerFecesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRNA, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmRNA, NeoplasmCirculating DNACirculating RNAColorectal cancerDNA integrityEarly diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID24574768
PMCPMC3921547
OpenAlexW65180750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.