Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574767›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Fabio Coppedè, Angela Lopomo, Roberto Spisni, Lucia Migliore

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 264 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. RETRACTED: The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. IncreasedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabio CoppedèFabio Coppedè, Angela Lopomo, Lucia Migliore, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Angela LopomoFabio Coppedè, Angela Lopomo, Lucia Migliore, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Roberto SpisniFabio Coppedè, Angela Lopomo, Lucia Migliore, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Lucia MiglioreFabio Coppedè, Angela Lopomo, Lucia Migliore, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer worldwide and results from the accumulation of mutations and epimutations in colonic mucosa cells ultimately leading to cell proliferation and metastasis. Unfortunately, CRC prognosis is still poor and the search of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is highly desired to prevent CRC-related deaths. The present article aims to summarize the most recent findings concerning the use of either genetic or epigenetic (mainly related to DNA methylation) biomarkers for CRC diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment. Recent large-scale DNA methylation studies suggest that CRC can be divided into several subtypes according to the frequency of DNA methylation and those of mutations in key CRC genes, and that this is reflected by different prognostic outcomes. Increasing evidence suggests that the analysis of DNA methylation in blood or fecal specimens could represent a valuable non-invasive diagnostic tool for CRC. Moreover, a broad spectrum of studies indicates that the inter-individual response to chemotherapeutic treatments depends on both epigenetic modifications and genetic mutations occurring in colorectal cancer cells, thereby opening the way for a personalized medicine. Overall, combining genetic and epigenetic data might represent the most promising tool for a proper diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGenetic TestingPrecision MedicineAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPatient SelectionPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorAPCColorectal cancerDiagnostic biomarkersDNA methylationEpigenetic biomarkersGenetic biomarkersKRASMGMT

Identifiers

PMID24574767
PMCPMC3921546
OpenAlexW1968907488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.