Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574706›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Diagnostic utility of faecal biomarkers in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Jan Däbritz, Jason Musci, Dirk Foell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal lactoferrin for inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Biomarkers of Environmental Enteric Dysfunction Among Children in Rural Bangladesh.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2017
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Inflammatory bowel disease biomarkers.Medicinal research reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Irritable Bowel Syndrome on Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Deep Remission: No Relation with Remission Deepening and Inflammation.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fecal calprotectin concentrations in cancer patients with Clostridium difficile infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan DäbritzJan Däbritz, Gastrointestinal Research in Inflammation and Pathology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia.
Jason MusciJan Däbritz, Gastrointestinal Research in Inflammation and Pathology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia.
Dirk FoellJan Däbritz, Gastrointestinal Research in Inflammation and Pathology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville 3052, VIC, Australia.
Royal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by unspecific symptoms. In clinical practice it is crucial to distinguish between non-inflammatory functional problems and inflammatory, malignant or infectious diseases of the GI tract. Differentiation between these involves the use of clinical, radiological, endoscopic, histological and serological techniques, which are invasive, expensive, time-consuming and/or hindered by inaccuracies arising from subjective components. A range of faecal markers now appears to have the potential to greatly assist in the differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and IBS. Faecal markers of neutrophil influx into the mucosa are reliable indicators of intestinal inflammation and their role has been mainly studied in discriminating IBD from non-IBD conditions (including IBS) rather than organic from non-organic diseases. Phagocyte-specific proteins of the S100 family (S100A12, calprotectin) are amongst the most promising faecal biomarkers of inflammation. Faecal leukocyte degranulation markers (lactoferrin, polymorphonuclear elastase and myeloperoxidase) have also been suggested as diagnostic tools for the differentiation of IBD and IBS. More recently, additional proteins, including granins, defensins and matrix-metalloproteases, have been discussed as differential diagnostic markers in IBD and IBS. In this review, some of the most promising faecal markers, which have the potential to differentiate IBD and IBS and to advance diagnostic practices, will be discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialFecesHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIrritable Bowel SyndromePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisBiomarkersCalprotectinDefensinsGraninsIrritable bowel syndromeLactoferrinM2-pyruvate kinasePolymorphonuclear elastaseS100A12

Identifiers

PMID24574706
PMCPMC3923012
OpenAlexW2068522893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.