Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574516›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2014

Spontaneous reversion of the angiogenic phenotype to a nonangiogenic and dormant state in human tumors.

Michael S Rogers, Katherine Novak, David Zurakowski, Lorna M Cryan, Anna Blois, Eugene Lifshits, Trond H Bø, Anne M Oyan, Elise R Bender, Michael Lampa and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Escape from breast tumor dormancy: The convergence of obesity and menopause.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Tumor dormancy in bone.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael S RogersAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Surgery and 2Anesthesia; 3the Vascular Biology Program, Boston Children's Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Department of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital; 6Section for Microbiology, The Gade Institute; 7Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine; and 8Section of Oncology, Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Katherine Novak
David Zurakowski
Lorna M Cryan
Anna Blois
Eugene Lifshits
Trond H Bø
Anne M Oyan
Elise R Bender
Michael Lampa
Soo-Young Kang
Kamila Naxerova
Karl-Henning Kalland
Oddbjorn Straume
Lars A Akslen
Randolph S Watnick
Judah Folkman
George N Naumov
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Novel Angiogenesis Inhibitors Targeting the Anthrax Toxin ReceptorsR01EY018829 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROGERS, MICHAEL SEAN · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe angiogenic switch, a rate-limiting step in tumor progression, has already occurred by the time most human tumors are detectable. However, despite significant study of the mechanisms controlling this switch, the kinetics and reversibility of the process have not been explored. The stability of the angiogenic phenotype was examined using an established human liposarcoma xenograft model. Nonangiogenic cells inoculated into immunocompromised mice formed microscopic tumors that remained dormant for approximately 125 days (vs. <40 days for angiogenic cells) whereupon the vast majority (>95%) initiated angiogenic growth with second-order kinetics. These original, clonally derived angiogenic tumor cells were passaged through four in vivo cycles. At each cycle, a new set of single-cell clones was established from the most angiogenic clone and characterized for in vivo for tumorigenic activity. A total of 132 single-cell clones were tested in the second, third, and fourth in vivo passage. Strikingly, at each passage, a portion of the single-cell clones formed microscopic, dormant tumors. Following dormancy, like the original cell line, these revertant tumors spontaneously switched to the angiogenic phenotype. Finally, revertant clones were transcriptionally profiled and their angiogenic output determined. Collectively, these data demonstrate that the angiogenic phenotype in tumors is malleable and can spontaneously revert to the nonangiogenic phenotype in a population of human tumor cells. IMPLICATIONS: Leveraging the rate of reversion to the nonangiogenic phenotype and tumor dormancy may be a novel anticancer strategy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Growth ProcessesCell Line, TumorGene ExpressionHeterograftsHumansLiposarcomaMaleMiceMice, SCIDNeovascularization, PathologicPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID24574516
PMCPMC4020951
OpenAlexW2140366220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.