Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574307›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2014

Generalized and specific neurocognitive deficits in psychotic disorders: utility for evaluating pharmacological treatment effects and as intermediate phenotypes for gene discovery.

James L Reilly, John A Sweeney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-wide association study accounting for anticholinergic burden to examine cognitive dysfunction in psychotic disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multivariate Relationships Between Cognition and Brain Anatomy Across the Psychosis Spectrum.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James L Reilly*To whom correspondence should be addressed; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 446 East Ontario Street Suite 7-100, Chicago, IL, US; tel: 312-503-4809, fax: 312-503-0527, e-mail: james.reilly@northwestern.edu.
John A Sweeney
Northwestern University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077862 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SWEENEY, JOHN A · 2007 to 2010
$3.1M
Antipsychotic Treatment Effects on Attention & Working Memory in SchizophreniaK23MH083126 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI REILLY, JAMES L · 2009 to 2013
$819k
NIMH NIH HHS MH077862NIMH NIH HHS MH083126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder share overlapping clinical, neurobiological, and genetic features, raising important questions about the boundaries and distinctiveness of these 2 major psychiatric disorders. A generalized cognitive impairment has long been understood to be a core feature of schizophrenia. More recently, it has become apparent that cognitive impairment also occurs in bipolar disorder, particularly in those patients with a history of psychotic symptoms. Whether a generalized deficit exists across a spectrum of psychotic disorders is less clearly established. Additionally, in the context of a broad impairment, it remains a significant challenge to identify deficits in specific cognitive processes that may have distinct neurochemical or regional brain substrates and linkages to particular risk-associated genetic factors. In this article, we review the findings from neuropsychological studies across a spectrum that includes schizophrenia, schizoaffective and bipolar disorders, and conclude the available evidence strongly supports that a generalized deficit is present across psychotic disorders that differs in severity more so than form. We then consider the implications of generalized and specific deficits in psychosis for 2 areas of research--the evaluation of pharmacological treatments targeting cognitive deficits, and the investigation of cognitive intermediate phenotypes in family genetic studies. Examples from the literature that touch on the relevance of the generalized deficit in these contexts are provided, as well as consideration for the continued need to identify specific impairments that are separable from the generalized deficit in order to advance drug and gene discovery.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyBipolar DisorderCognition DisordersEndophenotypesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeuropsychological TestsPhenotypePsychotic DisordersSchizophreniabipolar disordercognitionendophenotypeneuropsychologyschizoaffective disorderschizophreniatreatment effects

Identifiers

PMID24574307
PMCPMC3984526
OpenAlexW2169068836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.