Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24574009›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2014

Hox proteins drive cell segregation and non-autonomous apical remodelling during hindbrain segmentation.

Fabrice Prin, Patricia Serpente, Nobue Itasaki, Alex P Gould

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hox genes in development and beyond.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Segmentation and patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Review
  7. Mutually Repulsive EphA7-EfnA5 Organize Region-to-Region Corticopontine Projection by Inhibiting Collateral Extension.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cell segregation in the vertebrate hindbrain: a matter of boundaries.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabrice PrinDivision of Physiology and Metabolism, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 1AA, UK.
Patricia Serpente
Nobue Itasaki
Alex P Gould
Medical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U117584237Medical Research Council U117584237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hox genes encode a conserved family of homeodomain transcription factors regulating development along the major body axis. During embryogenesis, Hox proteins are expressed in segment-specific patterns and control numerous different segment-specific cell fates. It has been unclear, however, whether Hox proteins drive the epithelial cell segregation mechanism that is thought to initiate the segmentation process. Here, we investigate the role of vertebrate Hox proteins during the partitioning of the developing hindbrain into lineage-restricted units called rhombomeres. Loss-of-function mutants and ectopic expression assays reveal that Hoxb4 and its paralogue Hoxd4 are necessary and sufficient for cell segregation, and for the most caudal rhombomere boundary (r6/r7). Hox4 proteins regulate Eph/ephrins and other cell-surface proteins, and can function in a non-cell-autonomous manner to induce apical cell enlargement on both sides of their expression border. Similarly, other Hox proteins expressed at more rostral rhombomere interfaces can also regulate Eph/ephrins, induce apical remodelling and drive cell segregation in ectopic expression assays. However, Krox20, a key segmentation factor expressed in odd rhombomeres (r3 and r5), can largely override Hox proteins at the level of regulation of a cell surface target, Epha4. This study suggests that most, if not all, Hox proteins share a common potential to induce cell segregation but in some contexts this is masked or modulated by other transcription factors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBody PatterningCell MovementChick EmbryoEmbryo, MammalianFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, HomeoboxHomeodomain ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMiceRhombencephalonTranscription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsHoxb4 protein, mouseHoxd4 protein, mouseMembrane ProteinsTranscription FactorsApical polarityCell affinitiesCell segregationCell sortingCell tensionChickHindbrainHoxMouseRhombomeresSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID24574009
PMCPMC3957373
OpenAlexW2095996025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.