Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24573842›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Phenotypic and genomic plasticity of alternative male reproductive tactics in sailfin mollies.

Bonnie A Fraser, Ilana Janowitz, Margaret Thairu, Joseph Travis, Kimberly A Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Within-generation and transgenerational plasticity of mate choice in oceanic stickleback under climate change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Relating quantitative variation within a behavior to variation in transcription.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bonnie A FraserDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, , Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA, Max Plank Institute for Developmental Biology, , Tuebingen 70276, Germany, Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, , Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Ilana Janowitz
Margaret Thairu
Joseph Travis
Kimberly A Hughes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of modern evolutionary biology is to understand the causes and consequences of phenotypic plasticity, the ability of a single genotype to produce multiple phenotypes in response to variable environments. While ecological and quantitative genetic studies have evaluated models of the evolution of adaptive plasticity, some long-standing questions about plasticity require more mechanistic approaches. Here, we address two of those questions: does plasticity facilitate adaptive evolution? And do physiological costs place limits on plasticity? We examine these questions by comparing genetically and plastically regulated behavioural variation in sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna), which exhibit striking variation in plasticity for male mating behaviour. In this species, some genotypes respond plastically to a change in the social environment by switching between primarily courting and primarily sneaking behaviour. In contrast, other genotypes have fixed mating strategies (either courting or sneaking) and do not display plasticity. We found that genetic and plastic variation in behaviour were accompanied by partially, but not completely overlapping changes in brain gene expression, in partial support of models that predict that plasticity can facilitate adaptive evolution. We also found that behavioural plasticity was accompanied by broader and more robust changes in brain gene expression, suggesting a substantial physiological cost to plasticity. We also observed that sneaking behaviour, but not courting, was associated with upregulation of genes involved in learning and memory, suggesting that sneaking is more cognitively demanding than courtship.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhenotypeAdaptation, BiologicalAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBase SequenceBody SizeBrainFloridaGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationGenotypeLinear ModelsMaleMolecular Sequence DataPoeciliacourtshipmating behaviourplasticityPoecilia latipinnatranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID24573842
PMCPMC3953829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.