Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24573565›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2014

An enhanced model of cross-bridge operation with internal elasticity.

E V Rosenfeld, Michael Günther

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E V RosenfeldInstitute of Metal Physics, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 620041, Russia, rosenfeld@imp.uran.ru.
Michael Günther

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study has shown (as reported by Rosenfeld, Eur Biophys J 41:733-753, 2012) that an apparatus consisting of a cycling pump, a lever, and charged beads is able to generate force in accordance with Hill's force-velocity relation. Here, we show that a spring integrated into this microscopic model of a myosin motor allows reproducing, in general terms, the muscle fiber responses to sudden changes in fiber length. The time course of relaxation is governed by the same hindering force that determines the maximal value of muscle contraction velocity. Any single one of the exceptionally simple parts of the proposed model device corresponds to some element of the real myosin head and interacts with any other part in accordance with the laws of Newton, Coulomb, and Hooke. In essence, the model demonstrates that Coulomb repulsion should be understood as the physical source of muscle force. Accordingly, some fictitious master equation with ad hoc postulated rate constants is not needed to explain the essential mechanical characteristics of a muscle. The current model still contains no mechanism that could account for superfast relaxations within periods of about 0.1 ms.

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, BiologicalActin CytoskeletonBiomechanical PhenomenaMuscle CellsMyosinsMyosins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.