Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24573369›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

Developing cellular therapies for retinal degenerative diseases.

Kapil Bharti, Mahendra Rao, Sara Chandros Hull, David Stroncek, Brian P Brooks, Ellen Feigal, Jan C van Meurs, Christene A Huang, Sheldon S Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Retinal stem cell transplantation: Balancing safety and potential.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Patching the retina with stem cells.Nature biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kapil BhartiUnit on Ocular and Stem Cell Translational Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Mahendra Rao
Sara Chandros Hull
David Stroncek
Brian P Brooks
Ellen Feigal
Jan C van Meurs
Christene A Huang
Sheldon S Miller
National Eye Institute · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USCalifornia Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Institutes of Health · USRotterdam Eye Hospital · NL

Funding

Developing autologous iPSC-RPE based IND for AMD patientsZIAEY000542 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI BHARTI, KAPIL · 2014 to 2025
$24.2M
NHGRI/DIR Bioethics CoreZIDHG200347 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BERKMAN, BENJAMIN · 2010 to 2025
$15.5M
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cell Lines from Somatic Cells of Participants with Eye Diseases and from Somatic Cells of Matched ControlsZIAEY000539 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI HUFNAGEL, ROBERT · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Development of novel cell and gene therapiesZIACL002120 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI STRONCEK, DAVID · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical advances in vision research have been greatly facilitated by the clinical accessibility of the visual system, its ease of experimental manipulation, and its ability to be functionally monitored in real time with noninvasive imaging techniques at the level of single cells and with quantitative end-point measures. A recent example is the development of stem cell-based therapies for degenerative eye diseases including AMD. Two phase I clinical trials using embryonic stem cell-derived RPE are already underway and several others using both pluripotent and multipotent adult stem cells are in earlier stages of development. These clinical trials will use a variety of cell types, including embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE, bone marrow- or umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, fetal neural or retinal progenitor cells, and adult RPE stem cells-derived RPE. Although quite distinct, these approaches, share common principles, concerns and issues across the clinical development pipeline. These considerations were a central part of the discussions at a recent National Eye Institute meeting on the development of cellular therapies for retinal degenerative disease. At this meeting, emphasis was placed on the general value of identifying and sharing information in the so-called "precompetitive space." The utility of this behavior was described in terms of how it could allow us to remove road blocks in the clinical development pipeline, and more efficiently and economically move stem cell-based therapies for retinal degenerative diseases toward the clinic. Many of the ocular stem cell approaches we discuss are also being used more broadly, for nonocular conditions and therefore the model we develop here, using the precompetitive space, should benefit the entire scientific community.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAnimalsCell EngineeringClinical Trials as TopicCongresses as TopicCooperative BehaviorDisease Models, AnimalEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansNational Eye Institute (U.S.)Pluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineRetinal DegenerationStem Cell TransplantationTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited Statesage-related macular degenerationcell-based therapyretinitis pigmentosastem cells

Identifiers

PMID24573369
PMCPMC4587754
OpenAlexW2322363882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.