Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24573280›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Nonvisual complex spike signals in the rabbit cerebellar flocculus.

Beerend H J Winkelman, Tim Belton, Minah Suh, Michiel Coesmans, Menno M Morpurgo, John I Simpson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Purkinje Cell Representations of Behavior: Diary of a Busy Neuron.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  4. Complex Spike Wars: a New Hope.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  5. Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beerend H J WinkelmanDepartment Physiology and Neuroscience, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016.
Tim Belton
Minah Suh
Michiel Coesmans
Menno M Morpurgo
John I Simpson
New York University · US

Funding

VISUAL-VESTIBULAR INTERACTION IN EYE MOVEMENT CONTROLP01NS013742 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LLINAS, RODOLFO R · 1985 to 2011
$15.6M
VESTIBULO-CEREBELLAR CONTROL OF SPATIAL ORIENTATIONP01DC003284 · NIDCD · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI COHEN, BERNARD · 1997 to 2001
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-03284NINDS NIH HHS NS-13742NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS013742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the well-known signals of retinal image slip, floccular complex spikes (CSs) also convey nonvisual signals. We recorded eye movement and CS activity from Purkinje cells in awake rabbits sinusoidally oscillated in the dark on a vestibular turntable. The stimulus frequency ranged from 0.2 to 1.2 Hz, and the velocity amplitude ranged from 6.3 to 50°/s. The average CS modulation was evaluated at each combination of stimulus frequency and amplitude. More than 75% of the Purkinje cells carried nonvisual CS signals. The amplitude of this modulation remained relatively constant over the entire stimulus range. The phase response of the CS modulation in the dark was opposite to that during the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in the light. With increased frequency, the phase response systematically shifted from being aligned with contraversive head velocity toward peak contralateral head position. At fixed frequency, the phase response was dependent on peak head velocity, indicating a system nonlinearity. The nonvisual CS modulation apparently reflects a competition between eye movement and vestibular signals, resulting in an eye movement error signal inferred from nonvisual sources. The combination of this error signal with the retinal slip signal in the inferior olive results in a net error signal reporting the discrepancy between the actual visually measured eye movement error and the inferred eye movement error derived from measures of the internal state. The presence of two error signals requires that the role of CSs in models of the floccular control of VOR adaption be expanded beyond retinal slip.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiophysicsCerebellumFemaleLikelihood FunctionsMaleModels, StatisticalNeural PathwaysNystagmus, OptokineticPurkinje CellsRabbitsReflex, Vestibulo-OcularVestibule, Labyrinthaccessory optic systemclimbing fibercomplex spikeinferior oliveprepositus hypoglossiPurkinje cell

Identifiers

PMID24573280
PMCPMC3935084
OpenAlexW2078111887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.