ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014
α1F64 Residue at GABA(A) receptor binding site is involved in gating by influencing the receptor flipping transitions.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Φ value analysis underscores strong functional and structural compactness of the GABAProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- GABAJournal of neurochemistry · 2024Review
- Benzodiazepine Modulation of GABABiomolecules · 2022Review
- Shisa7-Dependent Regulation of GABAThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- αACS chemical neuroscience · 2022Article
- Computational models of neurotransmission at cerebellar synapses unveil the impact on network computation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Extracellular Metalloproteinases in the Plasticity of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses.Cells · 2021Review
- Mutations at the M2 and M3 Transmembrane Helices of the GABAACS chemical neuroscience · 2021Article
- αACS chemical neuroscience · 2021Article
- GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020Article
- Amino acid substitutions in the human homomeric βThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Distinct Modulation of Spontaneous and GABA-Evoked Gating by Flurazepam Shapes Cross-Talk Between Agonist-Free and Liganded GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- GABA-ρ receptors: distinctive functions and molecular pharmacology.British journal of pharmacology · 2017Review
- γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in plants.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
- Loop G in the GABAThe Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- The Role of PIEZO2 in Human Mechanosensation.The New England journal of medicine · 2016Article
- A role for loop G in the β1 strand in GABAA receptor activation.The Journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Contrasting actions of a convulsant barbiturate and its anticonvulsant enantiomer on the α1 β3 γ2L GABAA receptor account for their in vivo effects.The Journal of physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GABA receptors (GABAARs) mediate inhibition in the adult brain. These channels are heteropentamers and their ligand binding sites are localized at the β+ / α- interfaces. As expected, mutations of binding-site residues affect binding kinetics but accumulating evidence indicates that gating is also altered, although the underlying mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the impact of the hydrophobic box residue localized at α1(-), F64 (α1F64), on the binding and gating of rat recombinant α1β1γ2 receptors. The analysis of current responses to rapid agonist applications confirmed a marked effect of α1F64 mutations on agonist binding and revealed surprisingly strong effects on gating, including the disappearance of rapid desensitization, the slowing of current onset, and accelerated deactivation. Moreover, nonstationary variance analysis revealed that the α1F64C mutation dramatically reduced the maximum open probability without altering channel conductance. Interestingly, for wild-type receptors, responses to saturating concentration of a partial agonist, P4S, showed no rapid desensitization, similar to GABA-evoked responses mediated by α1F64C mutants. For the α1F64L mutation, the application of the high-affinity agonist muscimol partially rescued rapid desensitization compared with responses evoked by GABA. These findings suggest that α1F64 mutations do not disrupt desensitization mechanisms but rather affect other gating features that obscure it. Model simulations indicated that all of our observations related to α1F64 mutations could be properly reproduced by altering the flipped state transitions that occurred after agonist binding but preceded opening. In conclusion, we propose that the α1F64 residue may participate in linking binding and gating by influencing flipping kinetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.