Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24573278›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

α1F64 Residue at GABA(A) receptor binding site is involved in gating by influencing the receptor flipping transitions.

Marcin Szczot, Magdalena Kisiel, Marta M Czyzewska, Jerzy W Mozrzymas

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Φ value analysis underscores strong functional and structural compactness of the GABAProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. GABAJournal of neurochemistry · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Shisa7-Dependent Regulation of GABAThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. αACS chemical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. αACS chemical neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. GABAFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Amino acid substitutions in the human homomeric βThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in plants.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  15. Loop G in the GABAThe Journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
  16. The Role of PIEZO2 in Human Mechanosensation.The New England journal of medicine · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcin SzczotLaboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Biophysics, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław 50-358, Poland.
Magdalena Kisiel
Marta M Czyzewska
Jerzy W Mozrzymas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GABA receptors (GABAARs) mediate inhibition in the adult brain. These channels are heteropentamers and their ligand binding sites are localized at the β+ / α- interfaces. As expected, mutations of binding-site residues affect binding kinetics but accumulating evidence indicates that gating is also altered, although the underlying mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the impact of the hydrophobic box residue localized at α1(-), F64 (α1F64), on the binding and gating of rat recombinant α1β1γ2 receptors. The analysis of current responses to rapid agonist applications confirmed a marked effect of α1F64 mutations on agonist binding and revealed surprisingly strong effects on gating, including the disappearance of rapid desensitization, the slowing of current onset, and accelerated deactivation. Moreover, nonstationary variance analysis revealed that the α1F64C mutation dramatically reduced the maximum open probability without altering channel conductance. Interestingly, for wild-type receptors, responses to saturating concentration of a partial agonist, P4S, showed no rapid desensitization, similar to GABA-evoked responses mediated by α1F64C mutants. For the α1F64L mutation, the application of the high-affinity agonist muscimol partially rescued rapid desensitization compared with responses evoked by GABA. These findings suggest that α1F64 mutations do not disrupt desensitization mechanisms but rather affect other gating features that obscure it. Model simulations indicated that all of our observations related to α1F64 mutations could be properly reproduced by altering the flipped state transitions that occurred after agonist binding but preceded opening. In conclusion, we propose that the α1F64 residue may participate in linking binding and gating by influencing flipping kinetics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell Line, TransformedComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugGABA Agentsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansIon Channel GatingKineticsLysineMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhenylalanineProtein BindingGABA Agentsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidLysinePhenylalanineReceptors, GABA-Aagonist bindingdesensitizationGABAA receptorreceptor gatingγ-aminobutyric acid

Identifiers

PMID24573278
PMCPMC6795308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.