Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24572083›Full record

Trial reportJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2014

Capacity building from the inside out: development and evaluation of a CITI ethics certification training module for American Indian and Alaska Native community researchers.

Cynthia R Pearson, Myra Parker, Celia B Fisher, Claudia Moreno

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Extending Research Protections to Tribal Communities.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Alaska Native Health Research Forum: Perspectives on disseminating research findings.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.Science and engineering ethics · 2017
    Review
  17. A Web-Based Platform for Educating Researchers About Bioethics and Biobanking.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cynthia R PearsonUniversity of Washington.
Myra Parker
Celia B Fisher
Claudia Moreno

Funding

Tribal College and Universities Behavioral Wellness Project (TCU BeWell)P60MD006909 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DURAN, BONNIE M · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
Training Program in HIV Prevention Research EthicsR25DA031608 · NIDA · FORDHAM UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, CELIA B · 2011 to 2025
$4.9M
The ITZA Program: Indigenous HIV/AIDS Research Training 3 (IHART3) ProgramR25MH084565 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Teresa A Evans-Campbell, Michelle D Johnson-Jennings · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Mentoring Diverse Scientists in HIV Research on Substance Abuse and Mental HealthK24DA031613 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALTERS, KARINA LYNN · 2011 to 2015
$948k
Cognitive Processing Intervention for HIV/STI and Substance Use among Native WomeR34DA034529 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PEARSON, CYNTHIA RENEE · 2012 to 2014
$645k
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA031613NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA031608NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034529NIMHD NIH HHS NIMHDP60MD006909NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD006909NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH084565PHS HHS NIDA R25DA031608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current human subject research training modules fail to capture ethically relevant cultural aspects of research involving American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) community members. Applying a Community Engaged Research (CEnR) approach, we adapted the Collaborative IRB Training Initiative training module "assessing risk and benefits." In a two-arm randomized controlled trial, followed by debriefing interviews, we evaluated module acceptability and understandability (test scores) among 40 reservation-based community members. Participants who took the adapted module, compared to those who took the standard module, reported higher scores on relevance of the material overall satisfaction, module quiz scores, and a trend toward higher self-efficacy. Implications of the efficacy of this approach for enhancing ethics training and community participation in research within AI/AN and other cultural populations within and outside the United States are discussed.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCultureIndians, North AmericanInuitAdultAlaskaCertificationCommunity ParticipationComprehensionConsumer BehaviorCooperative BehaviorCurriculumEducational MeasurementEthics, ResearchFemale

Identifiers

PMID24572083
PMCPMC4004423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.