ArticleGenome medicine2014
Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease.
Article in Genome medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient participation in self-monitoring regarding healthcare of heart failure: an integrated systematic review.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- A dual domain systematic review and meta-analysis of risk tool accuracy to predict cardiovascular morbidity in prehypertension and diabetic morbidity in prediabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Improving Uptake of Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in a Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation Intervention: Large Effect Size but Room to Grow.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Impact of an electronic medium delivery of warfarin education in a low income, minority outpatient population: a pilot intervention study.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- The effects of a pretreatment educational group programme on mental health treatment outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Depression Screening and Education: Options to Reduce Barriers to Treatment (DESEO): protocol for an educational intervention study.BMC health services research · 2016Trial
- Patient Participation in Decision-Making During Nursing Care: A Relational Autonomy Perspective.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- An AI-Enabled Nursing Future With no Documentation Burden: A Vision for a New Reality.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- A Conceptual Framework for Individualized Patient Education in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Primary care physicians' perspectives on digital health tools for chronic disease management: A rapid review.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- What drives patient cost variability in psoriasis care: a single centre study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Because Doing "It" Matters to Patients: Development and Evaluation of a What Matters to Me Tool That Elicits Patients' Priorities to Support Cancer Treatment Shared Decision-Making.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- A call to action [plans] for cyclic vomiting syndrome.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Review
- Exploring Healthcare Workers' Knowledge and Perspectives on Behavioral Risk Factors Contributing to Non-Communicable Diseases: A Qualitative Study in Bushbuckridge, Ehlanzeni District, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A short tool to screen self-care preparedness: cross-sectional study in general practice.Family practice · 2024Article
- The interplay between patients and healthcare professionals in a cross-sectoral setting in connection with the treatment and care of patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a realistic evaluation.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Associations between adverse childhood experiences and trust in health and other information from public services, professionals and wider sources: national cross sectional survey.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Motivational interviewing skills practice enhanced with artificial intelligence: ReadMI.BMC medical education · 2024Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of patient engagement as an important risk factor for healthcare outcomes has not been well established. The objective of this article was to systematically review the relationship between patient engagement and health outcomes in chronic disease to determine whether patient engagement should be quantified as an important risk factor in health risk appraisals to enhance the practice of personalized medicine.
methodsA systematic review of prospective clinical trials conducted between January 1993 and December 2012 was performed. Articles were identified through a medical librarian-conducted multi-term search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Additional studies were obtained from the references of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on hypertension, diabetes, and chronic care. Search terms included variations of the following: self-care, self-management, self-monitoring, (shared) decision-making, patient education, patient motivation, patient engagement, chronic disease, chronically ill, and randomized controlled trial. Studies were included only if they: (1) compared patient engagement interventions to an appropriate control among adults with chronic disease aged 18 years and older; (2) had minimum 3 months between pre- and post-intervention measurements; and (3) defined patient engagement as: (a) understanding the importance of taking an active role in one's health and health care; (b) having the knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage health; and (c) using knowledge, skills and confidence to perform health-promoting behaviors. Three authors and two research assistants independently extracted data using predefined fields including quality metrics.
resultsWe reviewed 543 abstracts to identify 10 trials that met full inclusion criteria, four of which had 'high' methodological quality (Jadad score ≥ 3). Diverse measurement of patient engagement prevented robust statistical analyses, so data were qualitatively described. Nine studies documented improvements in patient engagement. Five studies reported reduction in clinical markers of disease (for example HbA1C). All studies reported improvements in self-reported health status.
conclusionsThis review suggests patient engagement should be quantified as part of a comprehensive health risk appraisal given its apparent value in helping individuals to effectively self-manage chronic disease. Patient engagement measures should include assessment of the knowledge, confidence and skills to prevent and manage chronic disease, plus the behaviors to do so.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.