ArticleCritical care (London, England)2014
Development of a simple score to predict outcome for unresponsive wakefulness syndrome.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value and mechanisms of EEG reactivity in the prognosis of patients with impaired consciousness: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Pooled it
- EEG spindles integrity in critical care adults. Analysis of a randomized trial.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2021Trial
- [Guangdong consensus on integrated Chinese and Western medicine management of prolonged disorders of consciousness].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a narrative review.Reviews in the neurosciences · 2026Review
- Long-Term Outcomes among Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- A Potential Prognosis Indicator Based on P300 Brain-Computer Interface for Patients with Disorder of Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Sleep in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: From Diagnosis to Prognosis.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021Review
- Prognostic models for prolonged disorders of consciousness: an integrative review.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- Differentiating Responders and Non-responders to rTMS Treatment for Disorder of Consciousness Using EEG After-Effects.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Article
- Disorders of Consciousness in China.Neuroscience bulletin · 2018Review
- Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography Predicts Outcome in Patients with Coma After Acute Brain Injury.Neuroscience bulletin · 2018Observational
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Brain Data and the Outcome in Disorders of Consciousness.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Night and day variations of sleep in patients with disorders of consciousness.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Predicting outcome from subacute unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or vegetative state.Critical care (London, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate assessment of prognosis for patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS; formerly vegetative state) may help clinicians and families guide the type and intensity of therapy; however, there is no suitable and accurate means to predict the outcome so far. We aimed to develop a simple bedside scoring system to predict the likelihood of awareness recovery in patients with UWS.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 56 patients (age range 10 to 73 years) with UWS 3 to 12 weeks post-onset. We collected demographic data and performed neurological, serological and neurophysiological tests at study entry. Each patient received a one year follow-up, during which awareness recovery was assessed by experienced physicians on the basis of clinical criteria. Univariate and multivariable analyses were employed to assess the relationships between predictors and awareness recovery.
resultsA total of 56 participants were included in the study; of these, 24 patients recovered awareness, 3 with moderate disabilities, 8 with severe disabilities, 12 were in a minimally conscious state, and 1 died after recovery. During the study, 23 patients remained in UWS and 9 died in UWS. Motor response, type of brain injury, electroencephalogram reactivity, sleep spindles and N20 were shown to be independent predictors for awareness recovery. Based on their coefficients in the model, we assigned these predictors with 1 point each and created a 5-point score for prediction of awareness recovery. The resulting score showed good predictive accuracy in the derivation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the score was 0.918 with 87.50% sensitivity.
conclusionThis simple bedside prognostic score can be used to predict the probability of awareness recovery in UWS, thus provide families and clinicians with useful outcome information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.