Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24571499›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Heteromers of μ-δ opioid receptors: new pharmacology and novel therapeutic possibilities.

Wakako Fujita, Ivone Gomes, Lakshmi A Devi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Tryptophan Substitution in CJ-15,208 (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opioid Analgesia and Opioid-Induced Adverse Effects: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wakako FujitaDepartment of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ivone Gomes
Lakshmi A Devi
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Enzymes Involved in Neuropeptide Biosynthesis, Processing and RegulationR01NS026880 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DEVI, LAKSHMI A · 1994 to 2019
$6.5M
Post-translational Regulation of Opioid and Cannabinoid Receptors.R37DA008863 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI DEVI, LAKSHMI A · 2012 to 2021
$4.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA008863NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS026880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSeveral studies suggest that heteromerization between μ (MOP) and δ (DOP) opioid receptors modulates the signalling properties of the individual receptors. For example, whereas activation of MOP receptors by an agonist induces G protein-mediated signalling, the same agonist induces β-arrestin-mediated signalling in the context of the MOP-DOP receptor heteromer. Moreover, heteromer-mediated signalling is allosterically modulated by a combination of MOP and DOP receptor ligands. This has implications in analgesia given that morphine-induced antinociception can be potentiated by DOP receptor ligands. Recently reagents selectively targeting the MOP-DOP receptor heteromer such as bivalent ligands, antibodies or membrane permeable peptides have been generated; these reagents are enabling studies to elucidate the contribution of endogenously expressed heteromers to analgesia as well as to the development of side-effects associated with chronic opioid use. Recent advances in drug screening technology have led to the identification of a MOP-DOP receptor heteromer-biased agonist that activates both G protein-mediated and β-arrestin-mediated signalling. Moreover, this heteromer-biased agonist exhibits potent antinociceptive activity but with reduced side-effects, suggesting that ligands targeting the MOP-DOP receptor heteromer form a basis for the development of novel therapeutics for the treatment of pain. In this review, we summarize findings regarding the biological and functional characteristics of the MOP-DOP receptor heteromer and the in vitro and in vivo properties of heteromer-selective ligands. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLigandsPainProtein MultimerizationReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muLigandsReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muantinociceptiondependenceheteromerhigh-throughput screeningopioidsignallingtolerancetrafficking

Identifiers

PMID24571499
PMCPMC4292954
OpenAlexW1914290984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.