Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24571098›Full record

ArticleNetwork (Bristol, England)

Gamma frequency feedback inhibition accounts for key aspects of orientation selectivity in V1.

John Lisman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network (Bristol, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John LismanBiology Department, Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University , Waltham, MA , USA.

Funding

CRCNS: Network Mechanisms Underlying Episodic MemoryR01MH102841 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LISMAN, JOHN E · 2013 to 2015
$817k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102841NIMH NIH HHS R01MH102841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is now strong evidence that gamma frequency oscillations occur during the engagement of cortical regions. These oscillations involve gamma frequency feedback inhibition. Thus, understanding the properties of this form of inhibition is critical to understanding how excitation and inhibition interact to determine which cells fire and, more generally, how cortex performs computations. In previous work, we argued that gamma frequency inhibition performs a type of winner-take-all computation that obeys simple rules: 1) cells fire if their excitation is within E% of the cell with maximum excitation; 2) E%max is determined by the delay of feedback inhibition and the membrane time constant. This framework was previously applied to the best-studied cortical computation, orientation selectivity of cells in V1. Measurements show that orientation tuning is insensitive to illumination contrast. We showed that this finding can be simply explained by the E%max model. Recently, a new property of orientation selectivity has been discovered: orientation tuning varies with the phase of the gamma oscillation. Here, we show that this too can be simply explained by the E%max model. These successes suggest that simple rules underlie the selection of which cells fire in cortical networks.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBrainHumansNeural InhibitionOrientation

Identifiers

PMID24571098
PMCPMC4243463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.