Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24570781›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2013

Research priority setting for health policy and health systems strengthening in Nigeria: the policymakers and stakeholders perspective and involvement.

Chigozie Jesse Uneke, Abel Ebeh Ezeoha, Chinwendu Daniel Ndukwe, Patrick Gold Oyibo, Friday Onwe, Bhupinder Kaur Aulakh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prioritization criteria in policies and management of human resources for health: a proposal for a validated methodology.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health Priorities in French-Speaking Swiss Cantons.International journal of health policy and management · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chigozie Jesse UnekeDepartment of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University, PMB 053 Abakaliki Nigeria.
Abel Ebeh EzeohaDepartment of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University, PMB 053 Abakaliki Nigeria.
Chinwendu Daniel NdukweDepartment of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University, PMB 053 Abakaliki Nigeria.
Patrick Gold OyiboDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of clinical Medicine, Delta State University, PMB 001 Abraka Nigeria.
Friday OnweDepartment of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, Faculty of clinical Medicine, Ebonyi State University, PMB 053 Abakaliki Nigeria.
Bhupinder Kaur AulakhAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (AHPSR) World Health Organization Avenue Appia 20 1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNigeria is one of the low and middle income countries (LMICs) facing severe resource constraint, making it impossible for adequate resources to be allocated to the health sector. Priority setting becomes imperative because it guides investments in health care, health research and respects resource constraints. The objective of this study was to enhance the knowledge and understanding of policymakers on research priority setting and to conduct a research priority setting exercise.

methodsA one-day evidence-to-policy research priority setting meeting was held. The meeting participants included senior and middle level policymakers and key decision makers/stakeholders in the health sector in Ebonyi State southeastern Nigeria. The priorities setting meeting involved a training session on priority setting process and conduction of priority setting exercise using the essential national health research (ENHR) approach. The focus was on the health systems building blocks (health workforce; health finance; leadership/governance; medical products/technology; service delivery; and health information/evidence).

resultsOf the total of 92 policymakers invited 90(97.8%) attended the meeting. It was the consensus of the policymakers that research should focus on the challenges of optimal access to health products and technology; effective health service delivery and disease control under a national emergency situation; the shortfalls in the supply of professional personnel; and the issues of governance in the health sector management.

conclusionResearch priority setting exercise involving policymakers is an example of demand driven strategy in the health policymaking process capable of reversing inequities and strengthening the health systems in LMICs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PolicyQuality ImprovementHealth WorkforceHumansNigeriaPolicy MakingResearchWorld Health OrganizationAfricahealth policyhealth system strengtheningpolicymakerspriority settingResearch

Identifiers

PMID24570781
PMCPMC3926765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.