Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24570754›Full record

ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2013

Renal denervation - current evidence and perspectives.

Ewa Warchoł-Celińska, Aleksander Prejbisz, Elżbieta Florczak, Jacek Kądziela, Adam Witkowski, Andrzej Januszewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ewa Warchoł-CelińskaInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksander PrejbiszInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Elżbieta FlorczakInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jacek KądzielaInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Adam WitkowskiInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej JanuszewiczInstitute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials have demonstrated that catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure and improves blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. The follow-up data indicate that the blood pressure lowering effect of the procedure may last for up to 36 months. Despite the fact that RDN is a growing and promising technique, still more data from clinical trials are needed to support the long-term safety and persistent efficacy of this approach as compared to the best possible pharmacological treatment. It would also be particularly important to recognize the clinical features of patients who would benefit most from RDN as well as the clinical characteristics of non-responders to the procedure. As renal denervation also reduces whole-body sympathetic nerve activity, the clinical entities characterized by sympathetic nervous system activation - including hypertension coexisting with metabolic abnormalities and/or sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and arrhythmias - may be potential new indications for the procedure. However, only a few small clinical studies so far have shown the potential benefit of renal denervation in these clinical situations and large clinical trials are needed to prove this concept. Catheter-based RDN is a promising (but also novel) therapeutic approach and further studies should also verify whether it can be considered as a procedure in management of patients not only with resistant hypertension, but also as a tool in the treatment of mild to moderate forms of hypertension.

Indexed as

hypertensionrenal denervationresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID24570754
PMCPMC3927110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.