Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24570687›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2013

What is the optimal cut-off point for low coronary artery calcium score assessed by computed tomography? Multi-Detector Computed Tomography ANIN Registry.

Edyta Kaczmarska, Cezary Kępka, Zofia Dzielińska, Radosław Pracoń, Karolina Kryczka, Joanna Petryka, Jerzy Pręgowski, Mariusz Kruk, Marcin Demkow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in Stable Chest Pain Patients: A Narrative Review.RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edyta KaczmarskaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Cezary KępkaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Zofia DzielińskaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Radosław PracońDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina KryczkaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna PetrykaDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy PręgowskiDepartment of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Mariusz KrukDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin DemkowDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Cardiology · PLCorona (Poland) · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis prospective study was conducted to evaluate the incidence and predictors of coronary artery disease (CAD) in relation to the low coronary artery calcium (CAC) score among patients with intermediate probability of CAD. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 1132 consecutive patients were included in the analysis (58.7 ±10.9 years, 46.7% males). Coronary computed tomography (CCT) angiography was performed in a multi-detector computed tomography scanner. Coronary artery calcium score was calculated by the Agatston method. Obstructive CAD was defined as the presence of coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% on CCT angiography.

resultsCoronary artery disease was diagnosed in nearly one-fourth of patients (n = 272, 24%). In the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis a CAC score of 10 was used as an optimal cut-off point for discriminating obstructive CAD (sensitivity: 0.79, specificity: 0.75, p < 0.0001) whereas for a CAC score of 100 the sensitivity and specificity were 0.48 and 0.92, respectively. On multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, creatinine levels, only in patients with CAC score ≤ 10 age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08, p = 0.0005, OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, p < 0.0001) and male gender (OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 1.92-6.22, p < 0.0001), likewise in group with CAC score ≤ 100 age (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, p < 0.0001) and male gender (OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.88-5.81, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of obstructive CAD.

conclusionsThe cut-off point of 10 for CAC score determined patients with CAD with the best sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, a total CAC score < 10 should be classified as "low". In patients with a low CAC score obstructive high risk plaques prone to rupture are presented and are associated with increasing age and male gender.

Indexed as

coronary artery calcium scorecoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID24570687
PMCPMC3915948
OpenAlexW2064071587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.