ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014
GIP/MZT1 proteins orchestrate nuclear shaping.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mutational disruption of transcription factors binding and regulatory networks in a case of unexplained total fertilization failure.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Nudt21-mediated alternative polyadenylation of MZT1 3'UTR contributes to pancreatic cancer progression.iScience · 2024Article
- Transcriptome analysis reveals genes associated with stem cell activation by physical exercise in the dentate gyrus of aged p16Ink4a knockout mice.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Regulation and Physiological Significance of the Nuclear Shape in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- GIP1 and GIP2 Contribute to the Maintenance of Genome Stability at the Nuclear Periphery.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Mitotic-Spindle Organizing Protein MztA Mediates Septation Signaling by Suppressing the Regulatory Subunit of Protein Phosphatase 2A-ParA inFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Nuclear envelope: a new frontier in plant mechanosensing?Biophysical reviews · 2017Review
- GIP Contributions to the Regulation of Centromere at the Interface Between the Nuclear Envelope and the Nucleoplasm.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- Arabidopsis MZT1 homologs GIP1 and GIP2 are essential for centromere architecture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Structure and Function of Centromeric and Pericentromeric Heterochromatin in Arabidopsis thaliana.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Review
- Protein interactions at the higher plant nuclear envelope: evidence for a linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functional organization of the nuclear envelope (NE) is only just emerging in plants with the recent characterization of NE protein complexes and their molecular links to the actin cytoskeleton. The NE also plays a role in microtubule nucleation by recruiting γ-Tubulin Complexes (γ-TuCs) which contribute to the establishment of a robust mitotic spindle. γ-tubulin Complex Protein 3 (GCP3)-interacting proteins (GIPs) have been identified recently as integral components of γ-TuCs. GIPs have been conserved throughout evolution and are also named MZT1 (mitotic-spindle organizing protein 1). This review focuses on recent data investigating the role of GIP/MZT1 at the NE, including insights from the study of GIP partners. It also uncovers new functions for GIP/MZT1 during interphase and highlights a current view of NE-associated components which are critical for nuclear shaping during both cell division and differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.