ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014
Evolution of microbiological analytical methods for dairy industry needs.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Analytical Approach for the Quality and Functional Evaluation of Probiotic Formulations: The Case of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Reproducibility crisis in isothermal amplification: lessons from benchmarking LAMP assays.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Development of real-time PCR methods for quality control detection of pathogenic bacteria in cosmetic preparations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A longitudinal study on the bacterial quality of baby spinach cultivated in Arizona and California.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- An Integrated Analytical Approach for the Characterization of Probiotic Strains in Food Supplements.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Emerging Bioanalytical Devices and Platforms for Rapid Detection of Pathogens in Environmental Samples.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Microfluidic One-Pot Digital Droplet FISH Using LNA/DNA Molecular Beacons for Bacteria Detection and Absolute Quantification.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Assessment of Bacterial Diversity of Industrial Poultry Wastewater by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and the Cultivation Method in Order to Inform Its Reuse in Agriculture.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as "Probiotic" in Foods and Dietary Supplements.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Gaps in the assortment of rapid assays for microorganisms of interest to the dairy industry.Advances in applied microbiology · 2020Review
- An important step forward for the future development of an easy and fast procedure for identifying the most dangerous wine spoilage yeast, Dekkera bruxellensis, in wine environment.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Improving End-User Trust in the Quality of Commercial Probiotic Products.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Simple and Precise Counting of Viable Bacteria by Resazurin-Amplified Picoarray Detection.Analytical chemistry · 2018Article
- Water Quality and Total Microbial Load: A Double-Threshold Identification Procedure Intended for Space Applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Electrooptical Determination of Polarizability for On-Line Viability and Vitality Quantification ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018Article
- Recent developments in detection and enumeration of waterborne bacteria: a retrospective minireview.MicrobiologyOpen · 2016Review
- Labeling quality and molecular characterization studies of products containing Lactobacillus spp. strains.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology · 2016Article
- Detection of Food Hazards in Foods: Comparison of Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Cultural Methods.Italian journal of food safety · 2016Article
- Optimization of single plate-serial dilution spotting (SP-SDS) with sample anchoring as an assured method for bacterial and yeast cfu enumeration and single colony isolation from diverse samples.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, culture-based methods have been used to enumerate microbial populations in dairy products. Recent developments in molecular methods now enable faster and more sensitive analyses than classical microbiology procedures. These molecular tools allow a detailed characterization of cell physiological states and bacterial fitness and thus, offer new perspectives to integration of microbial physiology monitoring to improve industrial processes. This review summarizes the methods described to enumerate and characterize physiological states of technological microbiota in dairy products, and discusses the current deficiencies in relation to the industry's needs. Recent studies show that Polymerase chain reaction-based methods can successfully be applied to quantify fermenting microbes and probiotics in dairy products. Flow cytometry and omics technologies also show interesting analytical potentialities. However, they still suffer from a lack of validation and standardization for quality control analyses, as reflected by the absence of performance studies and official international standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.