Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24570618›Full record

ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2014

Reliability of the dynavision™ d2 for assessing reaction time performance.

Adam J Wells, Jay R Hoffman, Kyle S Beyer, Adam R Jajtner, Adam M Gonzalez, Jeremy R Townsend, Gerald T Mangine, Edward H Robinson, William P McCormack, Maren S Fragala and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ketone monoester ingestion and cognitive and physical performance during exercise-heat stress.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The effect of an acute ingestion of Turkish coffee on reaction time and time trial performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2015
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurophysiology of ACL Injury.Orthopedic reviews · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam J WellsInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Jay R HoffmanInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Kyle S BeyerInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Adam R JajtnerInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Adam M GonzalezInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Jeremy R TownsendInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Gerald T MangineInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Edward H RobinsonInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
William P McCormackInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Maren S FragalaInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
Jeffrey R StoutInstitute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida , Orlando, FL 32816.
University of Central Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the Dynavision™ D2 Visuomotor Training Device (D2) has emerged as a tool in the assessment of reaction time (RT); however, information regarding the reliability of the D2 have been limited, and to date, reliability data have been limited to non- generalizable samples. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) for the D2 that are generalizable across a population of recreationally active young adults. Forty-two recreationally active men and women (age: 23.41 ± 4.84 years; height: 1.72 ± 0.11 m; mass: 76.62 ± 18.26 Kg) completed 6 trials for three RT tasks of increasing complexity. Each trial was separated by at least 48-hours. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to detect differences in performance across the six trials. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal differences (MD) were used to determine the reliability of the D2 from the two sessions with the least significant difference score. Moderate to strong reliability was demonstrated for visual RT (ICC2,1: 0.84, SEM: 0.033), and reactive ability in both Mode A and Mode B tasks (Mode A hits: ICC2,1: 0.75, SEM: 5.44; Mode B hits: ICC2,1: 0.73, SEM: 8.57). Motor RT (ICC2,1: 0.63, SEM: 0.035s) showed fair reliability, while average RT per hit for Modes A and B showed moderate reliability (ICC2,1: 0.68, SEM: 0.43 s and ICC2,1: 0.72, SEM: 0.03 s respectively). It appears that one familiarization trial is necessary for the choice reaction time (CRT) task while three familiarization trials are necessary for reactive RT tasks. In conclusion, results indicate that the Dynavision™ D2 is a reliable device to assess neuromuscular reactivity given that an adequate practice is provided. The data presented are generalizable to a population of recreationally active young adults. Key PointsThe Dynavision™ D2 is a light-training reaction device, developed to train sensory motor integration through the visual system, offering the ability to assess visual and motor reaction to both central and peripheral stimuli, with a capacity to integrate increasing levels of cognitive challenge.The Dynavision™ D2 is a reliable instrument for assessing reaction time in recreationally active young adults.It is recommended that one familiarization trial is necessary for the choice reaction time task assessment to learn the test protocol, while three familiarization trials are needed for reactive ability in Mode A and Mode B before a subsequent reliable baseline score can be established.Significant training effects were observed for all reaction time tests and should be taken into account with continuous trials.

Indexed as

Assessmentchoice reaction timemotorvisual

Identifiers

PMID24570618
PMCPMC3918550
OpenAlexW2139562849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.