Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24570455›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2014

Evaluation of the respiratory route as a viable portal of entry for Salmonella in poultry via intratracheal challenge of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium.

G Kallapura, M J Morgan, N R Pumford, L R Bielke, A D Wolfenden, O B Faulkner, J D Latorre, A Menconi, X Hernandez-Velasco, V A Kuttappan and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cases of Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Dynamic Changes in the Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Numbers FollowingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. iScience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  10. BioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Campylobacteriosis, Salmonellosis, Yersiniosis, and Listeriosis as Zoonotic Foodborne Diseases: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  13. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  14. Quantitative Tracking ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of respiratory route as a viable portal of entry forVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G KallapuraDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701.
M J Morgan
N R Pumford
L R Bielke
A D Wolfenden
O B Faulkner
J D Latorre
A Menconi
X Hernandez-Velasco
V A Kuttappan
B M Hargis
G Tellez
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental and epidemiological evidence suggests that primary infection of Salmonella is by the oral-fecal route for poultry. However, the airborne transmission of Salmonella and similar enteric zoonotic pathogens has been historically neglected. Increasing evidence of Salmonella bioaerosol generation in production facilities and studies suggesting the vulnerabilities of the avian respiratory architecture together have indicated the possibility of the respiratory system being a potential portal of entry for Salmonella in poultry. Presently, we evaluated this hypothesis through intratracheal (IT) administration of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium, as separate challenges, in a total of 4 independent trials, followed by enumeration of cfu recovery in ceca-cecal tonsils and recovery incidence in liver and spleen. In all trials, both Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium, challenged IT colonized cecae to a similar or greater extent than oral administration at identical challenge levels. In most trials, chickens cultured for cfu enumeration from IT-challenged chicks at same dose as orally challenged, resulted in an increase of 1.5 log higher Salmonella Enteritidis from ceca-cecal tonsils and a much lower dose IT of Salmonella Enteritidis could colonize ceca to the same extent than a higher oral challenge. This trend of increased cecal colonization due to IT challenge was observed with all trails involving week-old birds (experiment 2 and 3), which are widely considered to be more difficult to infect via the oral route. Liver-spleen incidence data showed 33% of liver and spleen samples to be positive for Salmonella Enteritidis administered IT (10(6) cfu/chick), compared with 0% when administered orally (experiment 2, trial 1). Collectively, these data suggest that the respiratory tract may be a largely overlooked portal of entry for Salmonella infections in chickens.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, OralChickensAerosolsAnimalsCecumFecesLiverPoultry DiseasesSalmonella enteritidisSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumSpleenAerosolsbroilerintratracheal challengeSalmonella EnteritidisSalmonella Typhimurium

Identifiers

PMID24570455
PMCPMC4990883
OpenAlexW2155803088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.