Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24569943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2014

Tailored prolapse surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoids and obstructed defecation syndrome with a new dedicated device: TST STARR Plus.

Gabriele Naldini, Jacopo Martellucci, Roberto Rea, Stefano Lucchini, Michele Schiano di Visconte, Angelo Caviglia, Claudia Menconi, Donglin Ren, Ping He, Domenico Mascagni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Indications, technique and results of the STARR procedure].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriele NaldiniProctological and Perineal Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Jacopo Martellucci
Roberto Rea
Stefano Lucchini
Michele Schiano di Visconte
Angelo Caviglia
Claudia Menconi
Donglin Ren
Ping He
Domenico Mascagni
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNClinica Mediterranea · ITNini Hospital · LBNuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · ITOspedale di Santa Maria dei Battuti · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of stapled transanal procedures performed by a new dedicated device, TST STARR Plus, for tailored transanal stapled surgery.

methodsAll the consecutive patients admitted to eight referral centres affected by prolapses with III-IV degrees haemorrhoids or obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) with rectocele and/or rectal intussusception that underwent stapled transanal resection with TST STARR plus were included in the present study. Haemostatic stitches for bleeding of the suture line, specimen volume, operative time, hospital stay and perioperative complications were recorded.

resultsFrom 1 November 2012 to 31 March 2013, 160 consecutive patients (96 females) were enrolled in the study. In 94 patients, the prolapse was over the half of the circular anal dilator (CAD). The mean duration of the procedure was 25 min. The mean resected volume of the specimen was 13.3 cm(3), the mean hospital stay was 2.2 days. In 88 patients (55%), additional stitches on the suture line were needed (mean 2.1). Suture line dehiscence was reported in four cases, with intraoperative reinforcement. Bleeding was reported in seven patients (5%). Urgency after 30 days was reported in one patient. No major complication occurred.

conclusionsThe new device seems to be safe and effective for a tailored approach to anorectal prolapse due to haemorrhoids or obstructed defecation.

Indexed as

Anal CanalConstipationDefecationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHemorrhoidsHemostatic TechniquesHumansIntestinal ObstructionLength of StayMaleOperative TimePainPatient SatisfactionProlapseRectal Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24569943
OpenAlexW2049343040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.