Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24569858›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2014

An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Barbara A Bernhardt, Katherine Kellom, Alexandra Barbarese, W Andrew Faucett, Ronald J Wapner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02160938 (Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis by Array-Based Copy Number Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02160938 completednot on this map

Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis by Array-Based Copy Number Analysis: Follow-Up

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorColumbia UniversityRan2013 to 2018Enrolled184ConditionsGenetic DiseasesArms3-year follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara A BernhardtDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, barbara.bernhardt@uphs.upenn.edu.
Katherine Kellom
Alexandra Barbarese
W Andrew Faucett
Ronald J Wapner

Funding

PRENATAL CYTOGENETIC DIAGNOSIS BY ARRAY-BASED COPY NUMBER ANALYSES: Follow-upU01HD055651 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAPNER, RONALD · 2012 to 2016
$6.6M
Penn Center for ELSI Research in Emerging Genetic Technologies in Health CareP50HG004487 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PYERITZ, REED E · 2007 to 2012
$6.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004487NICHD NIH HHS 5 U01 HD055651NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD055651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the higher yield over traditional chromosomal analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is being used increasingly in prenatal diagnosis. Unfortunately, the clinical implication of many copy number variants found on prenatal CMA is uncertain, complicating genetic counseling. Recognizing that uncertain results will be encountered frequently as more of the genome is assayed prenatally, we set out to understand the experiences and needs of genetic counselors when counseling patients about uncertain prenatal microarray results, their comfort with various aspects of prenatal genetic counseling, and their interest in additional education and training about prenatal microarray testing. We first interviewed 10 genetic counselors about their experiences of providing pre- and post-test genetic counseling about prenatal CMA. Based on the findings from the counselor interviews, we developed items for a survey to assess the prevalence of genetic counselors' attitudes towards, experience and comfort with, and educational needs regarding prenatal CMA. Based on surveys completed by 193 prenatal genetic counselors, we found that when there is an uncertain CMA result, only 59% would be comfortable providing genetic counseling and only 43% would be comfortable helping a patient make a decision about pregnancy termination. Being less comfortable was associated with seeing fewer patients having prenatal CMA testing. Respondents expressed a high degree of interest in additional education about prenatal CMA and counseling about uncertain results. Further genetic counselor education and training aimed at improving counselors' personal comfort with uncertain results and communicating about them with patients is needed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelChromosome AberrationsAdultFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansMicroarray AnalysisPregnancyPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID24569858
PMCPMC4147030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.