ReviewPlant physiology2014
Genetic and physiological controls of growth under water deficit.
Review in Plant physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 'Hughes constant' revisited: the unity and diversity in leaf area : fresh mass ratios within and across woody species.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Integrates Multispectral Phenotyping and Ionic Signatures to Reveal Stage-Specific Drought Resilience in Cotton.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Stomatalia: a deep learning-based platform for quantitative stomata and pavement cell analysis.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Large Variations in the Transpiration of Sorghum Canopies Under High Evaporative Demand Are Positively Related to Water Use Efficiency.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Nanoclay, calcium alginate, and composite soil amendments mitigate drought effects on wheat growth and water-use efficiency.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Assessment of Drought-Heat Dual Stress Tolerance in Woody Plants and Selection of Stress-Tolerant Species.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effect of the Aqueous Quercetin Solution on the Physiological Properties of Virginia Mallow (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cell wall modulation by drought and elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comparison of Growth and Physiological Effects of Soil Moisture Regime onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Plasticity QTLs specifically contribute to the genotype × water availability interaction in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Robotized indoor phenotyping allows genomic prediction of adaptive traits in the field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Selenium Regulates Antioxidant, Photosynthesis, and Cell Permeability in Plants under Various Abiotic Stresses: A Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Regulatory mechanisms behind the phenotypic plasticity associated with Setaria italica water deficit tolerance.Plant molecular biology · 2022Article
- In situ pod growth rate reveals contrasting diurnal sensitivity to water deficit in Phaseolus vulgaris.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Article
- Review
- Genetic Potential and Inheritance Patterns of Physiological, Agronomic and Quality Traits in Bread Wheat under Normal and Water Deficit Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Influence ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dynamics of cell wall structure and related genomic resources for drought tolerance in rice.Plant cell reports · 2021Review
- Combating Dual Challenges in Maize Under High Planting Density: Stem Lodging and Kernel Abortion.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sensitivity of expansive growth to water deficit has a large genetic variability, which is higher than that of photosynthesis. It is observed in several species, with some genotypes stopping growth in a relatively wet soil, whereas others continue growing until the lower limit of soil-available water. The responses of growth to soil water deficit and evaporative demand share an appreciable part of their genetic control through the colocation of quantitative trait loci as do the responses of the growth of different organs to water deficit. This result may be caused by common mechanisms of action discussed in this paper (particularly, plant hydraulic properties). We propose that expansive growth, putatively linked to hydraulic processes, determines the sink strength under water deficit, whereas photosynthesis determines source strength. These findings have large consequences for plant modeling under water deficit and for the design of breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.