ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2014
Clinical utility gene card for: Williams-Beuren Syndrome [7q11.23].
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative genomics reveals molecular mechanisms underlying health and reproduction in cryptorchid mammals.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Peripersonal Visuospatial Abilities in Williams Syndrome Analyzed by a Table Radial Arm Maze Task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Addressing the Educational Needs of Children with Williams Syndrome: A Rather Neglected Area of Research?Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Review
- Diagnostic Path of a Genetic Disease: A Case of Williams-Beuren Syndrome in Burkina Faso.Pediatric reports · 2015Article
- Sequential egocentric navigation and reliance on landmarks in Williams syndrome and typical development.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Genetic contributions to visuospatial cognition in Williams syndrome: insights from two contrasting partial deletion patients.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.