Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24569540›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2014

Sarcopenia assessment project in the nursing homes in Turkey.

M Halil, Z Ulger, M Varlı, A Döventaş, G B Oztürk, M E Kuyumcu, B B Yavuz, Y Yesil, F Tufan, M Cankurtaran and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Physical and Motor Fitness Tests for Older Adults Living in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sarcopenia and length of hospital stay. Is this a vicious cycle?European journal of clinical nutrition · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M HalilHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Z UlgerGazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
M VarlıAnkara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
A DöventaşIstanbul University, Faculty of Cerrahpasa Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
G B OztürkIstanbul University, Faculty of Istanbul Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
M E KuyumcuHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
B B YavuzHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Y YesilHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
F TufanIstanbul University, Faculty of Istanbul Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
M CankurtaranHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
B SakaIstanbul University, Faculty of Istanbul Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
S SahinEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
A CurgunluIstanbul Bilim University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
N TekinNarlidere Geriatric Care Center and Residential Home, Izmir, Turkey.
F AkçiçekEge University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
M A KaranIstanbul University, Faculty of Istanbul Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
T AtlıAnkara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
T BegerIstanbul University, Faculty of Cerrahpasa Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
D S ErdinçlerIstanbul University, Faculty of Cerrahpasa Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
S ArıoğulHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TRHacettepe University · TRAnkara University · TREge University · TRGazi University · TRIstanbul Bilim University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesSarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity (SO) are geriatric syndromes leading to physical disability, poor quality of life and death. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and SO in nursing homes in Turkey and to define local disparities for diagnosing sarcopenia and SO. SUBJECTS/

methodsThis cross-sectional multicenter study was performed in 711 patients in 14 nursing homes. Comprehensive geriatric assessment tests, handgrip strength and calf circumference (CC) measurements were carried out. Sarcopenia was both defined by handgrip strength and CC criteria.

resultsAccording to handgrip strength measurement, 483 (68%) of patients were sarcopenic (male: 72%, female: 63.8%), 228 were non-sarcopenic. The prevalence of SO was 22% (13.7% in men, 30.2% in women). Patients (82.5%) who were diagnosed as sarcopenic by the handgrip strength test were not sarcopenic according to CC sarcopenia criteria. Therefore, we tried to determine the optimal CC value for diagnosing sarcopenia in our population.

conclusionsBoth sarcopenia and SO were prevalent among Turkish nursing home elderly residents. Most of the patients with sarcopenia were obese or overweight. We showed that diagnosing sarcopenia with CC measurement underestimated the sarcopenia prevalence assessed by handgrip strength. So we concluded that, although different assessment methods are recommended for the diagnosis of sarcopenia local disparities should be considered.

Indexed as

Body SizeGeriatric AssessmentHand StrengthNursing HomesActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLegMaleMuscle, SkeletalObesityPrevalenceQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID24569540
OpenAlexW2074399130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.