Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24569538›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2014

Efficacy and safety of the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei LP-33 in allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (GA2LEN Study).

D J Costa, P Marteau, M Amouyal, L K Poulsen, E Hamelmann, M Cazaubiel, B Housez, S Leuillet, M Stavnsbjerg, P Molimard and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Efficacy ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Trial
  6. Cells · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Meta-analysis of the Effect of ProbioticMedeniyet medical journal · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative Case Study of Efficacy of Oral Bilastine Monotherapy to Concomittant Administration of Oral Bilastine with Probiotic in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Genomic Insight IntoFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Efficacy and Safety ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

D J CostaPrimary Care Department, University of Medicine, Montpellier I University, Montpellier, France.
P MarteauUniversity Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, APHP, Department of Hepato-gastro-enterology, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
M AmouyalPrimary Care Department, University of Medicine, Montpellier I University, Montpellier, France.
L K PoulsenAllergy Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital at Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
E HamelmannUniversity Children's Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Pediatrics, Bochum, Germany.
M CazaubielBiofortis, Mérieux NutriSciences Company, Saint-Herblain, France.
B HousezBiofortis, Mérieux NutriSciences Company, Saint-Herblain, France.
S LeuilletBiofortis, Mérieux NutriSciences Company, Saint-Herblain, France.
M StavnsbjergGlobal Regulatory and External Affairs, Chr. Hansen A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark.
P MolimardMerck Consumer Health, Merck Médication Familiale, Dijon, France.
S CourauMerck Consumer Health, Merck Médication Familiale, Dijon, France.
J Bousquet1] Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France [2] Inserm, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology team, Villejuif, France.
Merck (France) · FRChr. Hansen (Denmark) · DKGentofte Hospital · DKHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRRuhr University Bochum · DESorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAn imbalance between Th1 and Th2 cells is involved in allergic rhinitis (AR) that may be improved by probiotics. To test the efficacy of the probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei LP-33, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was carried out in patients with AR to grass pollen treated with loratadine and presenting altered quality of life. SUBJECTS/

methodsSubjects with persistent AR, symptomatic during the grass pollen season, and a positive skin test or specific immunoglobulin E to grass pollens were included by general practitioners (GPs). All received loratadine for 5 weeks. The primary end point was the improvement in Rhinitis Quality of Life (RQLQ) global score at the fifth week of LP-33 consumption compared with placebo (in addition to loratadine). Secondary end points included nasal and ocular symptoms (individual and total symptom scores), visual analogue scale and time of first exacerbation of the symptoms when loratadine was stopped.

resultsA total of 425 subjects were included. Using intent-to-treat analysis, the RQLQ global score decreased significantly more in the LP-33 group than in the placebo group (P=0.0255, difference=-0.286 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.536; -0.035)). No significant differences were noted for the change of the rhinitis total symptom score 5 global score between groups (P=0.1288, difference=-0.452 (95% CI: -1.036; 0.132)). Significant differences in ocular symptoms (RQLQ) were observed between groups (P=0.0029, difference=-0.4087 (95% CI: -0.6768; -0.1407)).

conclusionsThis study performed by GPs shows that LP-33 improves the quality of life of subjects with persistent AR who are currently being treated with an oral H1-antihistamine. Whereas nasal symptoms had not changed, ocular symptoms had consistently improved.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsLactobacillusAdultDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHistamine AntagonistsHumansLoratadineMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePollenProbioticsQuality of LifeRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalHistamine AntagonistsLoratadine

Identifiers

PMID24569538
OpenAlexW2061990838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.