ArticleBMJ open2014
Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan.
Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
163 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Burnout among neurosurgical professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and determinants.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Influence of Occupational Stress on the Body Mass Index of Hospital Workers: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Nurses' burnout and quality of life: A systematic review and critical analysis of measures used.Nursing open · 2022Pooled it
- Modulating Elements of Nurse Resilience in Population Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Burnout status of healthcare workers in the world during the peak period of the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of psychological intervention on empathy fatigue in nurses: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Physical relaxation for occupational stress in healthcare workers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of occupational health · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of Interventions on Learning Burnout: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression within front-line healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-regression.Human resources for health · 2020Pooled it
- The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychiatry research · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- [Risk factors and burnout levels in Primary Care nurses: A systematic review].Atencion primaria · 2017Pooled it
- Suicide in Healthcare Workers: An Umbrella Review of Prevalence, Causes, and Preventive Strategies.Journal of primary care & community healthPooled it
- Trial
- Effect of Structured Yoga Program on Stress and Professional Quality of Life Among Nursing Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Delhi-A Small Scale Phase-II Trial.Journal of evidence-based integrative medicineTrial
- Healthcare workers' perspectives on burnout complaints: exploring underlying dynamics using a complex systems approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Burnout and perceived stress in medical interns working at a hospital in Windhoek, Namibia.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
- Work-family conflict and burnout in night-shift nurses with children: the mediating roles of recovery experience and fatigue.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Burnout among COVID-19 hospital-based contact tracers in Singapore: results of a mixed-method, cross-sectional multicentre study.Singapore medical journal · 2025Article
- Study on fatigue, sleep quality and PTSD symptoms and influencing factors among prevention and control workers during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among five different medical professions in a regional teaching hospital.
designCross-sectional study.
settingHospital-based survey.
participantsA total of 1329 medical professionals were recruited in a regional hospital with a response rate of 89%. These voluntary participants included 101 physicians, 68 physician assistants, 570 nurses, 216 medical technicians and 374 administrative staff. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic data included gender, age, level of education and marital status, and work situations, such as position, work hours and work shifts, were obtained from an electronic questionnaire. Job strain and burnout were measured by two validated questionnaires, the Chinese version of the Job Content Questionnaire and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory.
resultsAmong the five medical professions, the prevalence of high work-related burnout from highest to lowest was nurses (66%), physician assistants (61.8%), physicians (38.6%), administrative staff (36.1%) and medical technicians (31.9%), respectively. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that job strain, overcommitment and low social support explained the most variance (32.6%) of burnout.
conclusionsPhysician assistant is an emerging high burnout group; its severity is similar to that of nurses and far more than that of physicians, administrative staff and medical technicians. These findings may contribute to the development of feasible strategies to reduce the stress which results in the burnout currently plaguing most hospitals in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.