Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24568584›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014

Microporous dermal-like electrospun scaffolds promote accelerated skin regeneration.

Paul P Bonvallet, Bonnie K Culpepper, Jennifer L Bain, Matthew J Schultz, Steven J Thomas, Susan L Bellis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biomimetic Hybrid Systems for Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomaterials for Skin Substitutes.Advanced healthcare materials · 2018
    Review
  13. COActa biomaterialia · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul P Bonvallet1 Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama.
Bonnie K Culpepper
Jennifer L Bain
Matthew J Schultz
Steven J Thomas
Susan L Bellis
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UAB Skin Diseases Research CenterP30AR050948 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TIMARES, LAURA · 2004 to 2013
$5.5M
Training Program in Cell, Molecular, and Developmental BiologyT32GM008111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YODER, BRADLEY K. · 1985 to 2022
$5.4M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) T32 (TL1)TL1TR000167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2012 to 2013
$111k
Enhanced coupling of bone regenerative peptides to hydroxyapatite-containing biomF31DE021613 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CULPEPPER, BONNIE K · 2010 to 2012
$72k
NCATS NIH HHS NIH TL1TR000167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NIAMS NIH HHS NIH P30 AR050948NIAMS NIH HHS P30AR050948NIDCR NIH HHS 1F31DE021613NIGMS NIH HHS GM 008111-25NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to synthesize skin substitutes that blend native extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules with synthetic polymers which have favorable mechanical properties. To this end, scaffolds were electrospun from collagen I (col) and poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL), and then pores were introduced mechanically to promote fibroblast infiltration, and subsequent filling of the pores with ECM. A 70:30 col/PCL ratio was determined to provide optimal support for dermal fibroblast growth, and a pore diameter, 160 μm, was identified that enabled fibroblasts to infiltrate and fill pores with native matrix molecules, including fibronectin and collagen I. Mechanical testing of 70:30 col/PCL scaffolds with 160 μm pores revealed a tensile strength of 1.4 MPa, and the scaffolds also exhibited a low rate of contraction (<19%). Upon implantation, scaffolds should support epidermal regeneration; we, therefore, evaluated keratinocyte growth on fibroblast-embedded scaffolds with matrix-filled pores. Keratinocytes formed a stratified layer on the surface of fibroblast-remodeled scaffolds, and staining for cytokeratin 10 revealed terminally differentiated keratinocytes at the apical surface. When implanted, 70:30 col/PCL scaffolds degraded within 3-4 weeks, an optimal time frame for degradation in vivo. Finally, 70:30 col/PCL scaffolds with or without 160 μm pores were implanted into full-thickness critical-sized skin defects. Relative to nonporous scaffolds or sham wounds, scaffolds with 160 μm pores induced accelerated wound closure, and stimulated regeneration of healthy dermal tissue, evidenced by a more normal-appearing matrix architecture, blood vessel in-growth, and hair follicle development. Collectively, these results suggest that microporous electrospun scaffolds are effective substrates for skin regeneration.

Indexed as

Skin, ArtificialTissue ScaffoldsAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsCells, CulturedElectroplatingEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansKeratinocytesLacerationsPorosityProsthesis DesignRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRegenerationRotation

Identifiers

PMID24568584
PMCPMC4161189
OpenAlexW1851070377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.