ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014
Microporous dermal-like electrospun scaffolds promote accelerated skin regeneration.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a Composite Electrospun Matrix as a Dermal Scaffold: Cell Behavior and Full-Thickness Wound Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Hydrogel Formulation for Biomimetic Fibroblast Cell Culture: Exploring Effects of External Stresses and Cellular Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Cobalt/Bioglass Nanoparticles Enhanced Dermal Regeneration in a 3-Layered Electrospun Scaffold.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Article
- Ideal Living Skin Equivalents, From Old Technologies and Models to Advanced Ones: The Prospects for an Integrated Approach.BioMed research international · 2024Review
- Preparation of laser microporous porcine acellular dermal matrix and observation of wound transplantation.Cell and tissue banking · 2023Article
- The Role of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) in Wound Healing: A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Biomimetic Hybrid Systems for Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Spun Biotextiles in Tissue Engineering and Biomolecules Delivery Systems.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Electrospun Biomaterials in the Treatment and Prevention of Scars in Skin Wound Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- 3D printed mesh reinforcements enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun scaffolds.Biomaterials research · 2019Article
- A novel egg-shell membrane based hybrid nanofibrous scaffold for cutaneous tissue engineering.Journal of biological engineering · 2019Article
- Biomaterials for Skin Substitutes.Advanced healthcare materials · 2018Review
- COActa biomaterialia · 2018Article
- Electrospun Collagen Nanofibers and Their Applications in Skin Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2017Review
- Biomaterials: A potential pathway to healing chronic wounds?Experimental dermatology · 2017Article
- Microporous dermal-mimetic electrospun scaffolds pre-seeded with fibroblasts promote tissue regeneration in full-thickness skin wounds.PloS one · 2015Article
- Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity.Tissue engineering · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to synthesize skin substitutes that blend native extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules with synthetic polymers which have favorable mechanical properties. To this end, scaffolds were electrospun from collagen I (col) and poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL), and then pores were introduced mechanically to promote fibroblast infiltration, and subsequent filling of the pores with ECM. A 70:30 col/PCL ratio was determined to provide optimal support for dermal fibroblast growth, and a pore diameter, 160 μm, was identified that enabled fibroblasts to infiltrate and fill pores with native matrix molecules, including fibronectin and collagen I. Mechanical testing of 70:30 col/PCL scaffolds with 160 μm pores revealed a tensile strength of 1.4 MPa, and the scaffolds also exhibited a low rate of contraction (<19%). Upon implantation, scaffolds should support epidermal regeneration; we, therefore, evaluated keratinocyte growth on fibroblast-embedded scaffolds with matrix-filled pores. Keratinocytes formed a stratified layer on the surface of fibroblast-remodeled scaffolds, and staining for cytokeratin 10 revealed terminally differentiated keratinocytes at the apical surface. When implanted, 70:30 col/PCL scaffolds degraded within 3-4 weeks, an optimal time frame for degradation in vivo. Finally, 70:30 col/PCL scaffolds with or without 160 μm pores were implanted into full-thickness critical-sized skin defects. Relative to nonporous scaffolds or sham wounds, scaffolds with 160 μm pores induced accelerated wound closure, and stimulated regeneration of healthy dermal tissue, evidenced by a more normal-appearing matrix architecture, blood vessel in-growth, and hair follicle development. Collectively, these results suggest that microporous electrospun scaffolds are effective substrates for skin regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.