Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24568571›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2014

Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice.

Julie Kent, Anne-Maree Farrell, Peter Soothill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Noninvasive fetal blood group antigen genotyping.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Laboratory Monitoring of Mother, Fetus, and Newborn in Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2021
    Review
  11. Two Reliable Methodical Approaches for Non-InvasiveDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Introduction of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Blood Group and Platelet Antigens from Cell-Free Plasma DNA Using Digital PCR.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Usefulness of Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping towards Immunoprophylaxis Optimization.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Non-invasive foetal RhD genotyping in admixed populations.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie KentDepartment of Health & Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK. Julie.Kent@uwe.ac.uk.
Anne-Maree Farrell
Peter Soothill

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT087439MF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince its introduction in the 1960s Anti-D immunoglobulin (Anti-D Ig) has been highly successful in reducing the incidence of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and achieving improvements to maternal and fetal health. It has protected women from other invasive interventions during pregnancy and prevented deaths and damage amongst newborns and is a technology which has been adopted worldwide. Currently about one third of pregnant women with the blood group Rhesus D (RhD) negative in the UK (approximately 40,000 women per year in England and Wales), receive antenatal Anti-D Ig in pregnancy when they do not require it because they are carrying a RhD negative fetus. Since 1997, a test using cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood has been developed to identify the genotype of the fetus and can be used to predict the fetal RhD blood group. DISCUSSION: This paper considers whether it is ethically acceptable to continue administering antenatal Anti-D Ig to all RhD negative women when fetal RHD genotyping using maternal blood could identify those women who do not need this product. SUMMARY: The antenatal administration of Anti-D Ig to a third of RhD negative pregnant women who carry a RhD negative fetus and therefore do not need it raises important ethical issues. If fetal RHD genotyping using maternal blood was offered to all RhD negative pregnant women it would assist them to make an informed choice about whether or not to have antenatal Anti-D Ig.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAnemia, HemolyticDNAFemaleFetal BloodFetusGenotypeHumansInjections, IntravenousIsoantibodiesPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRh IsoimmunizationRho(D) Immune GlobulinDNAIsoantibodiesRh-Hr Blood-Group SystemRHO(D) antibodyRho(D) antigenRho(D) Immune Globulin

Identifiers

PMID24568571
PMCPMC3944436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.