Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24568140›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2014

Reference values for isometric muscle force among workers for the Netherlands: a comparison of reference values.

Rob Kw Douma, Remko Soer, Wim P Krijnen, Michiel Reneman, Cees P van der Schans

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07764393 (Analysing The Effects of Different Foot Arch Heights on The Leg Muscle Tone and Balance in Young Adults.), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07764393 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Analysing The Effects of Different Foot Arch Heights on The Leg Muscle Tone and Balance in Young Adults.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstinye UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsPes Cavus, Pes Planus, Muscle Tone, Balance AssessmentArmsArch Height Index, Foot Posture Index, Single Leg Stance, Star Excrusion Blance Test (SEBT), Single-Leg Hop for Distance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reliability and Validity of Shoulder and Handgrip Strength Testing.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Predictive Value of thePatient related outcome measures · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rob Kw DoumaResearch and Innovation Group in Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Eysoniusplein 18 9714 CE, Groningen, The Netherlands. k.w.douma@pl.hanze.nl.
Remko Soer
Wim P Krijnen
Michiel Reneman
Cees P van der Schans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle force is important for daily life and sports and can be measured with a handheld dynamometer. Reference values are employed to quantify a subject's muscle force. It is not unambiguous whether reference values can be generalized to other populations. Objectives in this study were; first to confirm the reliability of the utilization of hand-held dynamometers for isometric strength measurement; second to determine reference values for a population of Dutch workers; third to compare these values with those of a USA population.

methods462 Healthy working subjects (259 male, 203 female) were included in this study. Their age ranged from 20 to 60 years with a mean (sd) of 41 (11) years. Muscle force values from elbow flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, and shoulder abduction were measured with the break method using a MicroFet 2 hand-held dynamometer. Reliability was analyzed by calculating ICC's and limits of agreement. Muscle force expressed in Newton, means, and confidence intervals were determined for males and females in age groups ranging from twenty to sixty years old. Regression equations and explained variances were calculated from weight, height, age, and gender. The mean values and 95% CI were compared to the results from other studies.

resultsReliability was good; the ICC ranged between 0.83 to 0.94. The explained variance ranged from 0.25 to 0.51. Comparison of data for the Dutch population mean muscle force values with those from the USA revealed important differences between muscle force reference values for the American and Dutch populations.

conclusionsMuscle force measurements demonstrate a sound reliability. Reference values and regressions equations are made available for the Dutch population. Comparison with other studies indicates that reference values differ between countries.

Identifiers

PMID24568140
PMCPMC3996060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.