Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24567840›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2014

Automated Screening of Hospitalized Children for Influenza Vaccination.

Ari H Pollack, Matthew P Kronman, Chuan Zhou, Danielle M Zerr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ari H PollackDivision of Nephrology, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine ari.pollack@seattlechildrens.org.
Matthew P KronmanDivision Infectious Diseases, Seattle Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Chuan ZhouDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine Division of General Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Washington.
Danielle M ZerrDivision Infectious Diseases, Seattle Children's Hospital Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Seattle Children's Hospital · USPediatric Nephrology of Alabama · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Pediatric Nephrology Training ProgramT32DK007662 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HINGORANI, SANGEETA · 1991 to 2020
$5.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was designed to determine whether an automated hospital-based influenza vaccination screening program leveraging the electronic medical record (EMR) increases vaccination rates.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of all children ≥6 months old admitted to medical, surgical, rehabilitation, or psychiatry services during influenza seasons between 2003 and 2012 at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. We compared influenza vaccination rates before (preintervention phase) and after (intervention phase) the introduction of an automated EMR intervention that utilized a nursing-based electronic screening tool to determine eligibility for influenza vaccine and facilitated vaccine ordering without requiring involvement of a physician or other provider.

resultsOverall, 42 716 (72.8%) of the 58,648 subjects admitted during the study period met inclusion criteria. The intervention phase included 20,651 admissions, of which 11 194 (54.2%) were screened. Screening increased significantly over time in the intervention phase (19.8%-77.1%; P < .001). In-hospital influenza vaccination rates increased from a mean of 2.1% (n = 472) of all subjects preintervention phase to 8.0% (n = 1645) in the intervention phase (odds ratio = 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 6.14-7.47). Of the 11 194 screened subjects, 5505 (49.2%) were found to have already been vaccinated at the time of screening. The screening process identified 478 (4.3%) subjects who were unable to receive vaccine for medical reasons, and an additional 2865 (25.6%) whose caregiver refused the vaccine.

conclusionsAn automated, hospital-based influenza vaccination program integrated into the EMR can increase vaccinations of hospitalized patients and provide insight into the vaccination history and declination reasons for children not receiving the vaccine.

Indexed as

electronic recordshospitalizationinfluenzapediatricvaccines

Identifiers

PMID24567840
PMCPMC3933048
OpenAlexW2120429142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.