ReviewEcancermedicalscience2014
Development of interactive empowerment services in support of personalised medicine.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02312700 (Development of an Interactive Empowerment Tool in Support of Patient Empowerment.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of an Interactive Empowerment Tool in Support of Patient Empowerment.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychosocial factors associated with quality of life in cancer patients undergoing treatment: an umbrella review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Pooled it
- A meta-analysis on heart rate variability biofeedback and depressive symptoms.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Training Cognitive Functions Using Mobile Apps in Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Pooled it
- Telemedicine Use Among Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Sexism Interacts with Patient-Physician Gender Concordance in Influencing Patient Control Preferences: Findings from a Vignette Experimental Design.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2020Trial
- Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT in responding to myotonic dystrophy type 1 patient inquiries: a specialist physician-based study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Emerging Technologies and Vulnerabilities in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairments: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Gordon McVie: his legacy as a blueprint for cancer advocates as we strive towards the 2030 global health and sustainable development goals.Ecancermedicalscience · 2022Article
- Evaluation of older people health passport implementation at primary health care centers in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2021Article
- Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Hereditary Gastric and Breast Cancer Syndromes Related to CDH1 Germline Mutation: A Multidisciplinary Clinical Review.Cancers · 2020Review
- Barriers to adoption of a personal health record in an ophthalmic setting: lessons from implementation of a Glaucoma Patient Passport.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
- Predicting trajectories of recovery in prostate cancer patients undergone Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP).PloS one · 2019Article
- The patient perspective: investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process.Ecancermedicalscience · 2019Article
- Towards precision medicine; a new biomedical cosmology.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2018Article
- A P5 Approach to m-Health: Design Suggestions for Advanced Mobile Health Technology.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Neuropsychological and Psychological Functioning Aspects in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Patients in Italy.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- mHealth and telemedicine apps: in search of a common regulation.Ecancermedicalscience · 2018Article
- Personal Health Information Recommender: implementing a tool for the empowerment of cancer patients.Ecancermedicalscience · 2018Article
- A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an epoch where shared decision making is gaining importance, a patient's commitment to and knowledge about his/her health condition is becoming more and more relevant. Health literacy is one of the most important factors in enhancing the involvement of patients in their care. Nevertheless, other factors can impair patient processing and understanding of health information: psychological aspects and cognitive style may affect the way patients approach, select, and retain information. This paper describes the development and validation of a short and easy to fill-out questionnaire that measures and collects psycho-cognitive information about patients, named ALGA-C. ALGA-C is a multilingual, multidevice instrument, and its validation was carried out in healthy people and breast cancer patients. In addition to the aforementioned questionnaire, a patient profiling mechanism has also been developed. The ALGA-C Profiler enables physicians to rapidly inspect each patient's individual cognitive profile and see at a glance the areas of concern. With this tool, doctors can modulate the language, vocabulary, and content of subsequent discussions with the patient, thus enabling easier understanding by the patient. This, in turn, helps the patient formulate questions and participate on an equal footing in the decision-making processes. Finally, a preview is given on the techniques under consideration for exploiting the constructed patient profile by a personal health record (PHR). Predefined rules will use a patient's profile to personalise the contents of the information presented and to customise ways in which users complete their tasks in a PHR system. This optimises information delivery to patients and makes it easier for the patient to decide what is of interest to him/her at the moment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.